Why Is My Calculation of Rotational Inertia Incorrect?

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the rotational inertia of three balls with different masses attached to a massless rod. The initial calculations yield a total rotational inertia of 3ML²/2, while the provided answer is 3ML²/4, leading to confusion. Participants agree on using the moment of inertia formula I = Σ(mir²) but suspect an arithmetic error or a flaw in the answer key. There's speculation about whether the distribution of mass in a sphere for the largest mass might affect the calculation, but the lack of a specified radius suggests it should not. The conversation highlights the importance of careful arithmetic and clarity in problem statements.
sskk221
Messages
10
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Three identical balls, with masses of M, 2M, and 3M, are fastened to a massless rod of length
L as shown. The rotational inertia about the left end of the rod is:

http://img13.imageshack.us/img13/1424/1234sjy.jpg

Homework Equations



I = MR^2

The Attempt at a Solution



I total = (3M)(0)^2 + (2M)(L/2)^2 + (M)(L)^2

I total = 3ML^2/2

It says the answer is 3ML^2/4 though. Thanks for the help
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes MD SHAHARIAZ ALAM
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm...

<br /> I = mr^{2}<br />

<br /> I = (3M)0^{2} + 2M(\frac{L}{2})^{2}) + ML^{2}<br />

Therefore;

<br /> I = \frac{1}{2}ML^{2} + ML^{2}<br />

<br /> I = \frac{3}{2} ML^{2}<br />

I get the same as you.

The definition of the moment of inertia is;

SUM( miri2 ) So I'm preaty certian that we are following the correct method. So perhaps it is some arithmetical mistake we are both making.

2/4 is 1/2 yes and 1/2mr2 + mr2 is mr2(1/2 + 1)
(1/2 + 1) = 3/2. Nope. I think your answer book might be flawed.

UNLESS you are meant to use the distribution of mass in a sphere for the first mass (3M). Mindyou, because they havn't given you a radius for the sphere I would assume not.

Haths
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
938
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K