Rotational mechanics string wrap around twig

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem in rotational mechanics involving a mass tied to a string wrapped around a twig. Participants are exploring the conditions under which the mass will not fall, particularly focusing on the role of friction between the string and the twig.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to determine the minimum number of wraps needed for the string to prevent the mass from falling, considering the friction involved. Questions arise about the complexity of the surfaces involved and the need for specific data to calculate friction accurately.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants questioning the assumptions about the surfaces and the nature of the friction involved. Some have suggested that the problem may require additional information, such as the coefficient of static friction and the force applied at the end of the string, to be fully addressed. There is interest in exploring the calculus involved in the solution.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem is complicated by the lack of precise values for the coefficient of friction and the forces involved. The original poster has clarified that the twig should be considered as a cylindrical surface, yet there remains uncertainty about how to approach the calculations without these values.

Priyanka88
Messages
13
Reaction score
4
A mass m is tied to a string which is wrapped to a twig of a tree. How many minimum times should we wrap the string so that it doesn't fall?

Here is what i got...
1.There is friction between the twig (or fixed cylinder) and the string.
2. if the total friction between the string wrapped around in 1 circle around the cylinder it will be a piece of cake.
3. The thing is that i am unable to find that because the operating friction force at every point from the free body diagram will be different
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20180822_114846.jpg
    IMG_20180822_114846.jpg
    6.9 KB · Views: 420
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
YOU HAVE FAILED TO UPLOAD YUOR IMAGE
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Priyanka88
Young physicist said:
YOU HAVE FAILED TO UPLOAD YUOR IMAGE
Check now!
 
Priyanka88 said:
A mass m is tied to a string which is wrapped to a twig of a tree. How many minimum times should we wrap the string so that it doesn't fall?

Here is what i got...
1.There is friction between the twig (or fixed cylinder) and the string.
2. if the total friction between the string wrapped around in 1 circle around the cylinder it will be a piece of cake.
3. The thing is that i am unable to find that because the operating friction force at every point from the free body diagram will be different
Well, I've seen your image, I got a question now: Do you actually mean "twig" as the "twig" of trees and "strings" as strings?
If so, you are now facing an extremely difficult question, here's why:

You need data of both surfaces to calculate the friction between them,right? Now:

1.Twigs have an extremely complicated surface, composed of dead cells,lichen and other stuff.
2.Strings have an extremely complcated surface too, different materials,weaving techniques affects it's surface.

So you are now dealing with a problem involving so many different topics which every single one of them is so ridiculously complex that I DON'T believe that's what the question, or you originally meant.

So, the problem must come with some sort of "assume the friction between the twig and the string is xxxxx", or else this will be solveless.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Priyanka88
Young physicist said:
Well, I've seen your image, I got a question now: Do you actually mean "twig" as the "twig" of trees and "strings" as strings?
If so, you are now facing an extremely difficult question, here's why:

You need data of both surfaces to calculate the friction between them,right? Now:

1.Twigs have an extremely complicated surface, composed of dead cells,lichen and other stuff.
2.Strings have an extremely complcated surface too, different materials,weaving techniques affects it's surface.

So you are now dealing with a problem involving so many different topics which every single one of them is so ridiculously complex that I DON'T believe that's what the question, or you originally meant.

So, the problem must come with some sort of "assume the friction between the twig and the string is xxxxx", or else this will be solveless.
Yeah i know. The twig is supposed to be considered as a cylinder. So the surface is of a plain cylinder! Even the string is a plain and cylindrical
 
Priyanka88 said:
Yeah i know. The twig is supposed to be considered as a cylinder. So the surface is of a plain cylinder! Even the string is a plain and cylindrical
Yeah, I know it should be, but you still can't know the friction between them.
Think about this: If you drew a right triangle with its two legs being 3 and 4, you know the last side is 5, because 3 and 4 are precise values.
(Pythagorean theorem)
But a "flat surface" isn't precise at all for calculating friction.

Or do you just need a solution with the friction considered as x?(Answer will be a polynomial of x)
 
I get it! I do know it's complications. I need a value with respect to coefficient of friction and mass m. I got why it's so hard... That's why I asked this doubt
 
This is a standard topic (given the simplifying assumption of a cylindrical twig) but there are two pieces of information missing:
  • The coefficient of static friction
  • The force applied at the other end of the string. If there is no force at all at the other end then, in principle, the string will always slip.
The solution is quite interesting. It involves some calculus.

By the way, your thread title is rather inapt. Nothing is rotating here.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Priyanka88
haruspex said:
This is a standard topic (given the simplifying assumption of a cylindrical twig) but there are two pieces of information missing:
  • The coefficient of static friction
  • The force applied at the other end of the string. If there is no force at all at the other end then, in principle, the string will always slip.
The solution is quite interesting. It involves some calculus.

Woah. calculus? I haven't reach math topics that hard yet, but I am now really interested about the solution since it has something to do it. Can you somehow post it after the two informaton missing shown above are fulfilled?

ps: i originally thought this will not be a tricky question as long as the friction between is being defined
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Priyanka88
  • #10
Young physicist said:
Woah. calculus? I haven't reach math topics that hard yet, but I am now really interested about the solution since it has something to do it. Can you somehow post it after the two informaton missing shown above are fulfilled?

ps: i originally thought this will not be a tricky question as long as the friction between is being defined
Take a look at https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capstan_equation
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: YoungPhysicist
  • #11
haruspex said:
This is a standard topic (given the simplifying assumption of a cylindrical twig) but there are two pieces of information missing:
  • The coefficient of static friction
  • The force applied at the other end of the string. If there is no force at all at the other end then, in principle, the string will always slip.
The solution is quite interesting. It involves some calculus.

By the way, your thread title is rather inapt. Nothing is rotating here.
Yeah i know it isnti about rotation, actually we were given this question just after rotation, anyway sorry about that... And the coefficient of friction is to be taken n. And the other end will require no force at the other end if there is friction because friction will be opposing the weight of the block
 
  • #12
Oh ohk i got this... Ah let me go through it once though. Thanks.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: YoungPhysicist
  • #13
haruspex said:
My question has nothing to do with a capstan... Take a rope and a cylinder... If you wind the rope around it and attach a mass to it, yoyou' see that it will slide but if the no. of windings is enough it won't slide due to the friction holding the rope acting between the cylinder and the rope! Yes it will require integration... That's no problem, my concern is to calculate friction acting on one element!
 
  • #14
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Priyanka88
  • #15
Young physicist said:
@haruspex he doesn't actually mean that. What he is trying to do is to take a piece of string, wrap it onto it with only the friction between the string and cylinder holding it.
Yes exactly!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: YoungPhysicist
  • #16
Young physicist said:
@haruspex he doesn't actually mean that. What he is trying to do is to take a piece of string, wrap it onto it with only the friction between the string and cylinder holding it.
But why would there be any? There would have to be a normal force, which must come from tension at the far end of the string or from the weight of the string.
If you put a few turns on then you will find (from the capstan solution) that you need very little tension. The weight of a dangling end of string might well be enough. But it cannot be zero, and in order to solve the question you must hypothesise a nonzero value.
 
  • #17
haruspex said:
which must come from tension at the far end of the string or from the weight of the string.
Yeah, and that tension causing the string to wrap tightly on the cylinder which then creates friction which then stops the mass M from moving.

Are me and @Priyanka88 thinking this the wrong way?
 
  • #18
Young physicist said:
Yeah, and that tension causing the string to wrap tightly on the cylinder which then creates friction which then stops the mass M from moving.

Are me and @Priyanka88 thinking this the wrong way?
My point is that you have to supply a value, either for a tension applied at the far end of the string or for the density of the string itself. With the first option you can then apply the capstan equation; with the second it is going to be a different equation (and might be rather tricky).

If you take the string as massless and do not apply sufficient tension at the other end then it will slip.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Priyanka88 and YoungPhysicist
  • #19
haruspex said:
My point is that you have to supply a value, either for a tension applied at the far end of the string or for the density of the string itself. With the first option you can then apply the capstan equation; with the second it is going to be a different equation (and might be rather tricky).

If you take the string as massless and do not apply sufficient tension at the other end then it will slip.
Yes! And my question is concerned with your 2nd case! Obviously the string is massed here! I am unable to make that tricky equation! That's where i need help
 
  • #20
Priyanka88 said:
Obviously the string is massed here!
Just asking,didn't your question come with that?o_O
 
  • #21
Young physicist said:
Just asking,didn't your question come with that?o_O
Well i said there is friction... Which means it is massed! If anyone is really solving it take it M1 if you want!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: YoungPhysicist
  • #22
Young physicist said:
Just asking,didn't your question come with that?o_O
Or just consider a value d as its linear mass density! That'll be easier
 
  • #23
Priyanka88 said:
If anyone is really solving it take it M1 if you want!
Well @haruspex what about that?(Since I haven't learn calculus yet, so I am also in a position of asking for help)
 
  • #24
Priyanka88 said:
Yes! And my question is concerned with your 2nd case! Obviously the string is massed here! I am unable to make that tricky equation! That's where i need help
Let the string have linear density ρ and the cylinder radius r.
If we consider a string element length rdθ at angle θ above the horizontal (starting where the string contacts the twig above the mass), it has weight ρgrdθ.
If the tension there is T(θ) then by force balance we can obtain the differential equation
##\frac{dT}{d\theta}=gr\rho (\cos(\theta)-\mu\sin(\theta))-\mu T##
This much you might be able to find for yourself. Since you are unfamiliar with calculus I will lay out the solution I found.

When the smoke clears:
##T=ce^{-\mu\theta}+\frac{gr\rho}{1+\mu^2}[2\mu(\cos(\theta)-1)-(\mu^2-1)\sin(\theta)]##
At θ=0 we have T=Mg, so c=Mg; at the other end, after n+½ turns, θ=(2n+1)π and T≤0.
##2n+1≥\frac 1{\mu\pi}\ln(\frac{M(1+\mu^2)}{4r\rho\mu})##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: YoungPhysicist
  • #25
@haruspex please explain how that differential equation came... Cause i tried and mine is different... The rest of all i understood!
 
  • #26
Priyanka88 said:
@haruspex please explain how that differential equation came... Cause i tried and mine is different... The rest of all i understood!
Maybe mine is wrong... how about you post your own derivation?

I was surprised by the solution I got to the differential equation. It says something strange happens for μ>1. I think this just means that with a high enough coefficient you would not even need a quarter turn of the twig.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Priyanka88
  • #27
haruspex said:
Maybe mine is wrong... how about you post your own derivation?

I was surprised by the solution I got to the differential equation. It says something strange happens for μ>1. I think this just means that with a high enough coefficient you would not even need a quarter turn of the twig.
Damn i got the equation! Thanks man
Check this if anyone wants to see the differential equation
 

Attachments

  • 15356088179227489423202965374607.jpg
    15356088179227489423202965374607.jpg
    36.3 KB · Views: 322
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: YoungPhysicist

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K