1. Not finding help here? Sign up for a free 30min tutor trial with Chegg Tutors
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Rotational Motion - Conservation angular momentum

  1. Aug 29, 2016 #1
    1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
    A 500.0-g bird is flying horizontally at 2.25 m>s, not paying much attention, when it suddenly flies into a stationary vertical bar, hitting it 25.0 cm below the top(Fig. P10.85). The bar is uniform, 0.750 m long, has a mass of 1.50 kg, and is hinged at its base. The collision stuns the bird so that it just drops to the ground afterward (but soon recovers to fly happily away).What is the angular velocity of the bar (a) just after it is hit by the bird and (b) just as it reaches the ground?

    2. Relevant equations
    L = Iw
    L = p x r
    I = ML^2/3 for a rod

    3. The attempt at a solution
    a) The angular momentum before the collision:
    L1 = Lbird + Lrod = p x r + 0 = mvr
    Then afterwards:
    L2 = Lbird + Lrod = 0 + Iw

    we get the equation: mvr = Iw from conservation of momentum

    Plug in the numbers: 0.5 * 2.25 * (0.75-0.25) = 1.5 * (0.75)^2 * w/3

    Solve for w = 2 rads/s

    b) I'm not really sure how to attack this one, the angular momentum won't be conserved because of the gravity enacting a torque on the object.

    Any suggestions?
     

    Attached Files:

  2. jcsd
  3. Aug 29, 2016 #2

    SammyS

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    physics-problem-2-png.105273.png

    You might consider using conservation of energy for part (b).
     
  4. Aug 29, 2016 #3
    Okay, so if I say 1/2Mv1^2 + MgL/2 = 1/2Mv2

    where v = wR

    Then, we get w1*L/2 + gL = w2*L/2

    THen 2 + 2g = w2

    SO we get 2 + 2g = w2

    And finally we get w2 = 21.62

    Which isn't the right answer, where did I go wrong?
     
  5. Aug 29, 2016 #4

    gneill

    User Avatar

    Staff: Mentor

    How do you justify the use of L/2 for the "radius" when calculating the initial KE?

    Instead, use the angular form for the KE: ##\frac{1}{2} I \omega^2##
     
  6. Aug 29, 2016 #5
    I was using the linear velocity of the center of mass. Isn't the angular kinetic energy for rotation about the center of mass, wouldn't this be zero in this case?
    This is why I was so confused for this question.
     
  7. Aug 29, 2016 #6
    I realised I made alot of mistakes on my previous post, so let me correct myself

    1/2Mv12 + MgL/2 = 1/2Mv22

    where v = wR, R = L/2 in this case

    Then, we get 1/2 * (w1R)2 + gR = 1/2 * (w2R)2

    So, 1/2 * 4 * R + g = 1/2 * w22*R

    THen (2R + g)*2 / R = ww2

    Solving for w, gives w = 7.5

    Not the right answer
     
  8. Aug 29, 2016 #7

    haruspex

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    2016 Award

    You can either use linear KE of the centre of mass and add angular KE about the mass centre (which is not zero, since it is rotating), or use angular kinetic energy about the hinge.

    For part a), I'm not sure how to interpret "the bird drops to the ground". You seem to have read it as saying the bird loses all horizontal momentum, which would imply some degree of elastic collision. You might be reading too much into the wording. I think you should consider it a purely inelastic collision.
     
  9. Aug 29, 2016 #8
    Hmmm, well I got the answer right for part a) considering it as an elastic collision, if I considered it as an inelastic collision, then I would get:

    L1 = 0.5*2.25*(0.75-0.25)
    L2 = (ML^2/3 + 0.5*0.52)*w

    Equating the two: 2.25/4 = (1.5*0.752/3 + 0.53) * w
    which gives me an answer of w = 1.38 for the rod and bird, which is not the answer the book gives
     
  10. Aug 29, 2016 #9

    SammyS

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member

    The wording of the problem is not too clear on this point, but I interpreted part (a) the way you did initially.
     
  11. Aug 29, 2016 #10

    haruspex

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Homework Helper
    Gold Member
    2016 Award

    ok.
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted



Similar Discussions: Rotational Motion - Conservation angular momentum
Loading...