Rotational Motion Question with Work Energy Theorem

Click For Summary
A 392-N wheel rolls off a truck and is rotating at 25.0 rad/s at the bottom of a hill, with a radius of 0.6 m and a moment of inertia of 0.800MR². The work done by friction as it rolls up the hill is 3500 J, which is considered in the work-energy theorem equation. The user is attempting to solve for height (h) but feels they are missing the velocity of the wheel's center of mass. It is clarified that the velocity can be derived from the angular velocity using the relationship between linear and angular motion, specifically that v = ωr. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding rolling without slipping to find the necessary variables for the calculation.
Yosty22
Messages
182
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement



A 392-N wheel comes off a moving truck and rolls without slipping along a highway. At the bottom of a hill, it is rotating at 25.0rad/s. The radius of the wheel is .6m and its moment of inertia about its rotation axis is 0.800MR2. Friction does work on the wheel as it rolls up the hill to a stop, a height h above the bottom of the hill; this work has absolute value 3500J. Calculate h

Homework Equations



Work Energy Theorem

The Attempt at a Solution



I tried to use the work-energy theorem but I feel like I am missing the velocity of the center of mass of the wheel. I set up my equation as:

U1+K1+Wother=U2+K2 where "Wother is the work done by friction, in this case 3500J in the direction opposite of motion. Also, U1 cancels and I believe K2 should cancel out.

Therefore, my equation is:

3500J+.5mv2+.5Iω2=mgh

It seems like I have 2 unknowns, h and v. Am I missing something?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you know omega, then you know v, because rolling without slipping means that every centimetre of distance moved by a point on the circumference of the wheel must correspond to the same number of centimetres of distance translated forward by the centre of mass of the wheel. Think about it and you'll see that if this weren't true, the wheel would have to be slipping.
 
Hi Yosty22! :smile:
Yosty22 said:
At the bottom of a hill, it is rotating at 25.0rad/s. The radius of the wheel is .6m …

It seems like I have 2 unknowns, h and v. Am I missing something?

you can find v (the initial speed) from the 25.0 rad/sec :wink:
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K