Rotational Motion: Solving a Problem with Translational and Angular Motion

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving rotational motion, specifically the conservation of angular momentum in a system with translational and angular components. Participants are analyzing the setup and the implications of choosing different reference points for calculating angular momentum.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the importance of selecting an appropriate reference point for angular momentum calculations. There are questions about whether to use the bottom or top of the rod, or the center of mass. Some participants express confusion regarding the original poster's diagram and the values assigned to masses and velocities.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of different reference points for angular momentum, with some participants suggesting using the center of the rod or the mass center of the system. The original poster has attempted calculations based on these discussions, but there is still uncertainty regarding the results and the calculations involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential mistakes in the original poster's diagram and calculations, particularly regarding the assignment of mass values and velocities. There is mention of the need for clarity in the representation of variables used in the calculations.

coldblood
Messages
133
Reaction score
0
Hi friends,
Please help me in solving this problem, I'll appreciate the help.

The problem is as:

https://fbcdn-sphotos-e-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc1/q71/s720x720/601231_1461726974054408_338858428_n.jpg

Attempt-
https://fbcdn-sphotos-c-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-frc3/q71/s720x720/1509289_1461726967387742_825364419_n.jpg


Thank you all in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For angular momentum, you need to be careful how you pick your reference point. You can use the mass centre or any fixed point in the inertial frame. Your choice appears to be the middle of the bar, which is neither.
 
haruspex said:
For angular momentum, you need to be careful how you pick your reference point. You can use the mass centre or any fixed point in the inertial frame. Your choice appears to be the middle of the bar, which is neither.

So according to you which point should I take here for conserving the angular momentum, Bottom or Top?
 
coldblood said:
So according to you which point should I take here for conserving the angular momentum, Bottom or Top?
Neither. You can use the mass centre of the system (messy) or any fixed point. How about the location of the rod's centre before it moves?
 
haruspex said:
Neither. You can use the mass centre of the system (messy) or any fixed point. How about the location of the rod's centre before it moves?

Well in my attempt, I conserve angular momentum about the center of the rod.
 
coldblood said:
Well in my attempt, I conserve angular momentum about the center of the rod.
Yes, but you must not use that in the sense of wherever the rod is at any given time, as it moves. You can use that fixed point in space where the middle of the rod was at the start.
 
haruspex said:
Yes, but you must not use that in the sense of wherever the rod is at any given time, as it moves. You can use that fixed point in space where the middle of the rod was at the start.

Ok Let me try for that.
 
haruspex said:
Yes, but you must not use that in the sense of wherever the rod is at any given time, as it moves. You can use that fixed point in space where the middle of the rod was at the start.

https://fbcdn-sphotos-b-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn2/1513192_1462156994011406_1703815557_n.jpg
 
I just reread the OP. A mistake in your diagram misled me. You drew it as though the masses are m and 2m, with both velocities v. It's the other way about: both masses are m and the velocities are v and 2v.
This is easier. The middle of the bar will be the mass centre, so you can use your original method.
 
  • #10
haruspex said:
I just reread the OP. A mistake in your diagram misled me. You drew it as though the masses are m and 2m, with both velocities v. It's the other way about: both masses are m and the velocities are v and 2v.
This is easier. The middle of the bar will be the mass centre, so you can use your original method.

https://fbcdn-sphotos-d-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-prn2/1471173_1462372860656486_905776386_n.jpg

Still not getting the perfect result.
 
  • #11
I'm having some trouble telling your v's from your b's. It looks like you may have done too. How did you get the amplitudes on the trig functions?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #12
haruspex said:
I'm having some trouble telling your v's from your b's. It looks like you may have done too. How did you get the amplitudes on the trig functions?

Well, there I think I have done wrong calculation for the distances.
What I have found is that, Now the rod has translational speed as well as the angular speed.
Translational velocity => v/2
and angular speed => ω = (3v)/b
After time t angular displacement of the rod, θ = ωt => θ = (3v)t/b
and due to angular motion,the top particle would be moving in the direction towards ivth quadrant[+x, -y] if θ < 900 (assumed at some time.)
So its speed would be (b/2)ω = (3v)/2 due to rotation.
Taking its component in x-axis and y - axis
X component, (3v)/2. cosθ => (3v)/2. cos[(3v)t/b]
Y component, (3v)/2. sinθ => (3v)/2. sin[(3v)t/b]

Then the net speed in the x direction would be, (v/2) + (3v)/2. cos[(3v)t/b]
and in the y direction, (3v)/2. sin[(3v)t/b]
Now after integrating it I got the answer, Thanks a lot.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
26
Views
3K