Rounding to required level of accuracy

  • Thread starter Thread starter roger12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Accuracy
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of significant figures in calculations involving measurements. The original poster presents two problems requiring calculations to a specified level of accuracy based on significant figures derived from measured values.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to apply significant figure rules to their calculations but questions their results compared to a textbook. Some participants affirm the original poster's reasoning for the first problem while suggesting a different interpretation for the second problem.

Discussion Status

Participants are exploring the nuances of significant figure rules, particularly how they apply differently to multiplication/division versus addition/subtraction. There is acknowledgment of potential discrepancies between the original poster's answers and textbook solutions, leading to further questioning of the textbook's rules.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the textbook may have unconventional rules regarding "required level of accuracy" versus standard significant figure practices, which could contribute to the confusion experienced by the original poster.

roger12
Messages
12
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Calculate each of the following to the required level of accuracy given that each number, other than those indicated in brackets, has been obtained by measurement.

a) (3.142*1.95)/6*(3*5.44^2+1.95^2)
(power 2, divisor 6, multiplier 3)

b) (3.142*1.234)/12*( 0.424^2+0.424*0.951+0.951^2)
(power 2 and divisor 12)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



a)My calculator gives me 94.5414368

So I think 94.5 should be the answer since 1.95 has the least number of significant figures- three. My book, though, says it is 94.54

b) The calculator gives 0.4805827337

So my answer is 0.480 because 0.424 and 0.951 each have only 3 sig figs- least number of sig figures. But my book says the answer is 0.4806


Please, show me where I am wrong.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The rules for sig. fig.s are different for (addition&subtraction) than they are for (multiplication&division).

Your answer (a) looks right to me. 1.95 is a factor of all the rest, so it should limit the result to 3 sig. fig.

For (b) however, each factor in ( 0.4242+0.424*0.951+0.9512) is accurate to the 0.001 place, so the result of adding these three factors is also accurate to the 0.001 place. That give 4 sig. fig. for that result. Each of the other two factors, 3.142 & 1.234 also has 4 sig. fig.s.
 
SammyS said:
The rules for sig. fig.s are different for (addition&subtraction) than they are for (multiplication&division).

Your answer (a) looks right to me. 1.95 is a factor of all the rest, so it should limit the result to 3 sig. fig.

For (b) however, each factor in ( 0.4242+0.424*0.951+0.9512) is accurate to the 0.001 place, so the result of adding these three factors is also accurate to the 0.001 place. That give 4 sig. fig. for that result. Each of the other two factors, 3.142 & 1.234 also has 4 sig. fig.s.

Thank you for the answer. I tried to apply the rule that used for (b) to another problem and got another wrong answer.

[4.62^2-(7.16-2.35)]/ [2.63+1.89* √(73.24)]

The answer is 0.8793. I thought the answer had to be rounded to 3 sig fig.
 
roger12 said:
Thank you for the answer. I tried to apply the rule that used for (b) to another problem and got another wrong answer.

[4.62^2-(7.16-2.35)]/ [2.63+1.89* √(73.24)]

The answer is 0.8793. I thought the answer had to be rounded to 3 sig fig.
Beats me!

I agree with you on this one.

Does your textbook have some unusual rules for these?
 
Maybe the author treats "required level of accuracy" different than "significant figures".
?
 
SammyS said:
Beats me!

I agree with you on this one.

Does your textbook have some unusual rules for these?

It's Engineering Math by Stroud. It's a great book. Sometimes unexpected problems with strange answers pop up. These are some of the few.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
840
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K