Runner's power and displacement

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves a 60-kg runner increasing her speed from 2 m/s to 4.3 m/s over a period of 5 seconds, with a focus on determining the power developed and the distance traveled, assuming constant power and neglecting air resistance.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to calculate power and displacement using kinetic energy and impulse-momentum principles but encounters difficulties with the displacement calculation.
  • Some participants suggest using kinematic equations to find distance and question the application of impulse-momentum in this context.
  • Others explore the implications of constant power on the relationship between kinetic energy and velocity over time.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively exploring different methods to solve the problem, with some providing insights into the implications of constant power on the runner's energy. There is no explicit consensus on the best approach, but productive discussions are ongoing.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of calculating displacement without knowing the force or distance directly, and there is mention of the assumption of constant power affecting the analysis.

stinlin
Messages
72
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


A 60-kg runner increases her speed from 2 m/s to 4.3 m/s in 5 s. Assuming she develops constant power during this time interval and neglecting air resistance, determine (a) the power developed, (b) the distance traveled.

Homework Equations



P = W/t
T = kinetic energy = 1/2mv^2

The Attempt at a Solution



The power was easy:

T1 + U1->2 = T2

U1->2 = T2 - T1 = 1/2*m(v2^2 - v1^2) = 434.7 J

P = U/t = 434.7/5 = 86.9 W

Ok, but the displacement, I'm not sure:

P = W/t = Fd, and that's all I have. I don't know F. I know P, W,t, but without F or d, I'm slightly screwed. Can I have some help? If it helps, I DO know the answer, but I'd like to see a solution/arrive at an answer before looking at it. :rolleyes:

EDIT

I just tried Impulse-Momentum and STILL didn't get the right answer:

mv1 + Imp 1->2 = mv2

Imp 1->2 = F(t2-t1) and t2-t1 = 5s

So:

F = (m(v2-v1))/(t2-t1) = 27.6

P = W/t = Fd/t -----> Pt/F = d

Using that, I'm getting the wrong answer of 15.74 m.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You can use the kinematics equations to solve for the distance.
[tex]s=ut+0.5at^2[/tex], you have t, you can find out a by (v-u)/t.
 
stinlin said:

I just tried Impulse-Momentum and STILL didn't get the right answer:

mv1 + Imp 1->2 = mv2

Imp 1->2 = F(t2-t1) and t2-t1 = 5s

So:

F = (m(v2-v1))/(t2-t1) = 27.6

P = W/t = Fd/t -----> Pt/F = d

Using that, I'm getting the wrong answer of 15.74 m.


The forces here arent impulsive. You could equate the change in momentum to average force, divide by m to get average acceleration and then use the equation above to get the distance.
 
Neither of those methods work - I tried them both previous to posting this. =(
 
"Assuming she develops constant power", then at any time t, 0< t< 5, ((1/2)mv2- (1/2)m(22)/t= 30(v2- 4)/t= 86.9 so
v2= 2.9t+ 4. [itex]v= dx/dt= \sqrt{2.9t+ 4}[/itex]. Integrate that to find the distance run in those 5 seconds.
 
Woah, that gives the right answer...Haha - can you explain that one more time please?
 
He's using the 'constant power' condition to say that the energy of the runner is increasing at a constant rate. In other words, that kinetic energy is a linear function of time. Meaning in turn that v^2 is a linear function of time. Using information in the problem he finds this function, solves for v and integrates it. Does that help?
 
I guess it makes perfect sense, I'm just confused still about the idea of constant power development and it's implications. Can you give another example where this would apply by chance?
 
How about a motor running at constant power and spinning up a flywheel? Stuff like that.
 
  • #10
I can understand the verbal example, but what's the deal with integrating due to constant power development?
 
  • #11
There's no special concept of 'constant power development'. The point was just to find the time derivative of something and then integrate it to get the change in the something.
 

Similar threads

Replies
40
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K