Rutherford Scattering Derivation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the derivation of the Rutherford scattering trajectory, emphasizing the role of the Coulomb force between an incoming particle and a target nucleus. It highlights the necessity of considering both radial and centripetal components of acceleration in the derivation. The radial acceleration is influenced by the distance r, while the centripetal acceleration arises from the particle's angular motion, which is essential for accurately describing the trajectory in a polar coordinate system.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Coulomb's Law and its application in particle interactions
  • Familiarity with polar coordinate systems in physics
  • Knowledge of linear momentum conservation principles
  • Basic calculus, particularly derivatives and their physical interpretations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Coulomb force in detail
  • Learn about polar coordinates and their applications in mechanics
  • Explore the concept of centripetal acceleration in circular motion
  • Investigate advanced topics in scattering theory and its applications in nuclear physics
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, particularly those studying classical mechanics and nuclear physics, as well as educators looking to enhance their understanding of scattering phenomena.

Dalkiel
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm trying to work out the derivation of the the Rutherford scattering trajectory. I understand the conservation of linear momentum, and that the only force acting is the coulomb force between the incoming particle and the target nucleus. Early on in the derivation I'm told that essentially there are two components to the acceleration, a radial and centripetal. I understand each component separately, but I just don't understand why there are two parts to the acceleration.


Homework Equations


F = \frac{zZe^{2}}{4\pi\epsilon_{0}r^{2}}=M\left[\frac{d^{2}r}{dt^{2}}-r\left(\frac{d\varphi}{dt}\right)^{2}\right]

XLtHPl8.png


The Attempt at a Solution


The force is dependent on r, and thus so is the acceleration. The first term on the right (second derivative of position) I understand as the acceleration at a given distance r, and is the radial acceleration. The second term is where I'm running into a bit of trouble. It is the centripetal acceleration, and has a direction opposite that of the radial acceleration. I can also see that it is radial velocity squared times r. I just don't see why it's in the derivation. The acceleration is dependent on r, and we have the first term that takes that into consideration.
 
Physics news on Phys.org

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K