Rydberg constant for hydrogen atom and Balmer series

Click For Summary
The Rydberg constant remains constant as it is derived from fundamental constants. Discrepancies in measurements related to the hydrogen atom and the Balmer series may arise from the limitations of the Bohr model, which is an approximation that neglects certain effects like fine structure. Additionally, the accuracy of experimental measurements can also contribute to these discrepancies. Understanding these factors is crucial for accurate analysis in atomic physics. The discussion emphasizes the importance of refining models and measurement techniques to enhance precision.
sss1
Messages
50
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
Does the Rydberg constant change for different Balmer series lines? Like H_α, H_β, etc. according to the formula, it shouldn’t right, it should only change with the amount of electrons and nucleons? I googled some data and I put them into the formula 1/lambda=R(1/n_f^2-1/n_i^2) and tried for several wavelengths for hydrogen (n_f=2), I ended up with pretty close values but with minor differences. I was wondering if this is due to the accuracy of the instruments measuring the wavelength? Or is it meant to differ for different Balmer series lines?
Relevant Equations
1/lambda=R(1/n_f^2-1/n_i^2)
^^
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Rydberg constant is a combination of fundamental constants and so it does not change. The discrepancies you are seeing are probably due to the fact that the Bohr model is only an approximate model and ignores some effects, such as fine structure. Or it could also be due to the accuracy of the measurements, as you said.
 
phyzguy said:
The Rydberg constant is a combination of fundamental constants and so it does not change. The discrepancies you are seeing are probably due to the fact that the Bohr model is only an approximate model and ignores some effects, such as fine structure. Or it could also be due to the accuracy of the measurements, as you said.
Alright, thanks!
 
Thread 'Chain falling out of a horizontal tube onto a table'
My attempt: Initial total M.E = PE of hanging part + PE of part of chain in the tube. I've considered the table as to be at zero of PE. PE of hanging part = ##\frac{1}{2} \frac{m}{l}gh^{2}##. PE of part in the tube = ##\frac{m}{l}(l - h)gh##. Final ME = ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}gh^{2}## + ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}hv^{2}##. Since Initial ME = Final ME. Therefore, ##\frac{1}{2}\frac{m}{l}hv^{2}## = ##\frac{m}{l}(l-h)gh##. Solving this gives: ## v = \sqrt{2g(l-h)}##. But the answer in the book...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
902
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K