Ryder, QFT 2nd Ed. Page 47, eqn (1.122)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jimmy Snyder
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qft
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 2K views
Jimmy Snyder
Messages
1,137
Reaction score
22

Homework Statement


[tex](1 - \frac{i}{2}\mathbf{\sigma\cdot\theta})\mathbf{\sigma}(1 + \frac{i}{2}\mathbf{\sigma\cdot\theta}) = \mathbf{\sigma - \theta\times\sigma}[/tex]

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


At one point in this, I temporarily ignore the y and z components. I hope the notation is not too confusing.
[tex](1 - \frac{i}{2}\mathbf{\sigma\cdot\theta})\mathbf{\sigma}(1 + \frac{i}{2}\mathbf{\sigma\cdot\theta}) = \mathbf{\sigma} + \frac{i}{2}(\mathbf{\sigma}(\mathbf{\sigma\cdot\theta}) - (\mathbf{\sigma\cdot\theta})\mathbf{\sigma})[/tex]
[tex]= \mathbf{\sigma} + \frac{i}{2}(\sigma_x(\sigma_x\theta_x + \sigma_y\theta_y + \sigma_z\theta_z) - (\sigma_x\theta_x + \sigma_y\theta_y + \sigma_z\theta_z)\sigma_x) + ()[/tex]
[tex]= \mathbf{\sigma} + \frac{i}{2}(\theta_x + 2i\sigma_z\theta_y - 2i\sigma_y\theta_z) - (\theta_x - 2i\sigma_z\theta_y + 2i\sigma_y\theta_z)) + ()[/tex]
[tex]= \mathbf{\sigma} - 2(\sigma_z\theta_y - \sigma_y\theta_z) + ()[/tex]
and finally, putting the y and z compenents back in:
[tex](1 - \frac{i}{2}\mathbf{\sigma\cdot\theta})\sigma(1 + \frac{i}{2}\mathbf{\sigma\cdot\theta}) = \mathbf{\sigma - 2\theta\times\sigma}[/tex]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
[tex]\left[ \vec{\sigma}-\frac{i}{2}\left( \vec{\sigma}\cdot \vec{\theta}\right) \vec{\sigma}\right] \left[ 1+\frac{i}{2}\left( \vec{\sigma}\cdot \vec{\theta}\right) \right] =\vec{\sigma}+\frac{i}{2}\vec{\sigma}\left( \vec{\sigma}\cdot \vec{\theta}\right) -\frac{i}{2}\left( \vec{\sigma}\cdot \vec{\theta}\right) \vec{\sigma}+\mathcal{O}\left( \theta ^{2}\right)[/tex]

[tex]=\left[ \sigma _{i}+\frac{i}{2}\left( \sigma _{i}\sigma _{j}-\sigma _{j}\sigma _{i}\right) \theta _{j}\right] \vec{e}_{i}+\mathcal{O}\left( \theta ^{2}\right)=\left( \sigma _{i}+\frac{i}{2}2i\varepsilon _{ijk}\sigma _{k}\theta _{j}\right) \vec{e}_{i}=\vec{\sigma}-\vec{\theta}\times \vec{\sigma}+\mathcal{O}\left( \theta ^{2}\right)[/tex]

So Ryder was right this time.
 
dextercioby said:
Ryder was right this time.
Thanks dextercioby. I do try hard to solve these matters before I post. It has taken me a month just to get to page 92. I cannot explain what mental blindness caused me to have trouble with this one though.