(S)-2,3- Dihydroxypropanal priority

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the prioritization of functional groups in organic chemistry nomenclature, specifically regarding hydroxide and carboxyl groups in the context of stereochemistry. It clarifies that hydroxide is prioritized over the carboxyl group, which in turn is prioritized over the hydroxymethyl group (-CH2OH). The assignment of R or S stereochemistry is based on the atomic number of the atoms directly attached to the chiral center, rather than their position in a carbon chain. The conversation also addresses the isomeric relationship between (S)-2,3-dihydroxypropanal and glyceraldehyde, noting that they are enantiomers differing in the stereochemistry of the chiral carbon. The importance of understanding group priorities in stereochemistry is emphasized, with a suggestion to review the concepts for clarity.
nomadreid
Gold Member
Messages
1,748
Reaction score
243
TL;DR Summary
In (S)-2,3- Dihydroxypropanal, the (2,3) indicates that the numbering starts at O, but doesn't OH have higher priority than O?
The question in the summary refers to
priority.webp

While I am here, I might as well be hanged for a sheep as for a lamb, so another question that will reveal the fact that I am relatively new to organic chemistry nomenclature refers to the following diagram:
priority 2.webp

Why is one hydroxide given priority over the carboxyl group (if that's what the priority #2 group is), and the carboxyl group is given priority over the other hydroxide? And why couldn't the one that now has priority #3 get priority #1 and vice-versa?
Thanks for any help.
 
Last edited:
Chemistry news on Phys.org
#3 is a -CH2OH group, not an -OH group. And the priorities for the purpose of assigning R or S stereochemistry have nothing to do with numbering along a carbon chain.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes nomadreid and berkeman
Many thanks, mjc123. Your answer to my second question helps me adjust my thinking to looking at the groups. That's definite progress. So now I need to figure out why the priorities appear to be: hydroxide>carboxyl>hydroxymethyl >Hydrogen

Also, the top diagram in my above post, I read, is (S)-2,3- Dihydroxypropanal, and the second one glyceraldehyde. They are isomers, both having the formula C3H6O3
, but I don't see the difference in the structures.

Thanks again for your patience and help.
 
2,3-dihydroxypropanal is glyceraldehyde. There are two enantiomers; the top one in your post is the S isomer and the bottom one the R isomer (also known as L- and D-glyceraldehyde respectively). They differ in the stereochemistry of the chiral carbon atom (no.2).

You have obviously come across the concept of priorities of groups in assigning stereochemistry. I suggest you review what you have learned and come back with specific questions if there's something you don't understand. (Basically it goes by the highest atomic number of the atom adjacent to the chiral centre, then the one after that and so on.)
 
Thanks very much, mjc123. Super. Excellent information, followed by sage advice that I will indeed follow.
 
Glad to be of help.
 
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...
I was introduced to the Octet Rule recently and make me wonder, why does 8 valence electrons or a full p orbital always make an element inert? What is so special with a full p orbital? Like take Calcium for an example, its outer orbital is filled but its only the s orbital thats filled so its still reactive not so much as the Alkaline metals but still pretty reactive. Can someone explain it to me? Thanks!!
I'm trying to find a cheap DIY method to etch holes of various shapes through 0.3mm Aluminium sheet using 5-10% Sodium Hydroxide. The idea is to apply a resist to the Aluminium then selectively ablate it off using a diode laser cutter and then dissolve away the Aluminium using Sodium Hydroxide. By cheap I mean resists costing say £20 in small quantities. The Internet has suggested various resists to try including... Enamel paint (only survived seconds in the NaOH!) Acrylic paint (only...
Back
Top