S0(3)/SO(2) is isomorphic to the projective plane

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter eddo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Plane
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies that SO(3)/SO(2) is isomorphic to the 2-sphere, while SO(3)/O(2) is isomorphic to the projective plane. The confusion arises from a textbook reference that incorrectly states SO(3)/SO(2) relates to the projective plane. The relationship between O(n) and SO(n) explains why antipodal points are identified when modding out by O(n). This distinction is crucial for understanding the geometric implications of these groups.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lie groups, specifically SO(n) and O(n).
  • Familiarity with the concept of isomorphism in topology.
  • Knowledge of projective spaces, particularly the real projective plane.
  • Basic understanding of geometric intuition regarding spheres and antipodal points.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of SO(3) and O(2) in detail.
  • Learn about the topology of spheres and projective spaces.
  • Explore the concept of quotient spaces in topology.
  • Investigate the implications of identifying antipodal points in geometric contexts.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those studying topology and geometry, as well as students working on assignments related to Lie groups and projective spaces.

eddo
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
For an assignment, my prof asked that we show that S0(3)/SO(2) is isomorphic to the projective plane (ie the 2-sphere with antipodal points identified). Here's my problem. I checked in a textbook for some help, and it claimed that SO(3)/SO(2) is isomorphic to the 2-sphere. So which one is right? It would be nice to know what I should be trying to prove before I put too much work in. Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
eddo said:
For an assignment, my prof asked that we show that S0(3)/SO(2) is isomorphic to the projective plane (ie the 2-sphere with antipodal points identified). Here's my problem. I checked in a textbook for some help, and it claimed that SO(3)/SO(2) is isomorphic to the 2-sphere. So which one is right? It would be nice to know what I should be trying to prove before I put too much work in. Thank you.

S^n \cong SO \left( n+1 \right)/SO \left( n \right)

and

\mathbb{R}P^n \cong SO \left( n+1 \right)/O \left( n \right),

so SO \left( 3 \right)/SO \left( 2 \right) is isomorphic to the 2-sphere, and SO \left( 3 \right)/O \left( 2 \right) is isomorphic to the projective plane.
 
Last edited:
Thank you. Intuitively that's what I expected to be the case, because of the relationship between O(n) and SO(n). It makes sense that antipodal points get identified if you mod out by O(n) because the reflections that O(n) has over SO(n) would identify these points. But you can't always count on intuition so thank you for verifying this.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K