Sakurai 1.27 - Transformation Operators

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves evaluating the expression \(\langle b''|f(A)|b'\rangle\) for a function of a Hermitian operator \(A\), given the transformation matrix between two bases, \(a'\) and \(b'\). The context is rooted in quantum mechanics, specifically in the manipulation of eigenstates and operators.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the expression by summing over the eigenstates of the operator and applying properties of the inner product. They express uncertainty about the correctness of their final step.
  • Some participants question the assumptions made regarding the inner product being the Dirac delta function and suggest that the problem statement may need clarification.
  • Others propose reconsidering the initial steps to avoid potential issues with the final conclusion.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on the original poster's approach and raising questions about the assumptions involved. There is a suggestion to refine the initial steps to strengthen the argument, indicating a productive direction without reaching a consensus.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of the eigenkets being associated with a Hermitian operator and the absence of degeneracy, which may influence the interpretation of the inner products involved. However, the original poster's statement regarding the Dirac delta function is questioned and not universally accepted.

Domnu
Messages
176
Reaction score
0
Problem
Suppose that [tex]f(A)[/tex] is a function of a Hermitian operator [tex]A[/tex] with the property [tex]A|a'\rangle = a'|a'\rangle[/tex]. Evaluate [tex]\langle b''|f(A)|b'\rangle[/tex] when the transformation matrix from the [tex]a'[/tex] basis to the [tex]b'[/tex] basis is known.The attempt at a solution
Here's what I have... I'm not sure if the last step is correct, but apart from that, I'm sure everything else is right. So,

[tex]\langle b''|A|b'\rangle = \sum_{a'} \sum_{a''} \langle b'' | a'' \rangle \langle a'' | A | a' \rangle \langle a' | b' \rangle[/tex]
[tex]= \sum_{a'} \sum_{a''} \delta(a'-a'') a' \langle b'' | a'' \rangle \langle a' | b' \rangle[/tex]
[tex]= \sum_{a'} a' \langle b'' | a' \rangle \langle a' | b' \rangle[/tex]

And then I said that the above was

[tex]= a' \langle b'' | b' \rangle = a' \delta(b' - b'') \Leftrightarrow \langle b'' | f(A) | b' \rangle = f(a') \delta(b' - b'')[/tex]

where [tex]a'[/tex] was the eigenvalue of corresponding eigenket to [tex]b'[/tex].

Is the last step correct? That was the only part I was a bit shaky on... there is an [tex]a'[/tex] index inside the summation...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would say that, while your first step is correct, you can do better than that. I suggest that you think of an even better first step which will obviate your suspect final step.

BTW, your problem statement did not specify that the inner product is the Dirac delta. Is this stated somewhere else?
 
It's the Dirac delta because they're eigenkets of some operator (okay well to make the argument more rigorous, the eigenkets a and b are eigenkets of some Hermitian operator where there is no degeneracy).
 
Domnu said:
It's the Dirac delta because they're eigenkets of some operator (okay well to make the argument more rigorous, the eigenkets a and b are eigenkets of some Hermitian operator where there is no degeneracy).
This remains insufficient to determine that [tex]\langle{}a'|a''\rangle=\delta\left(a'-a''\right)[/tex], etc.. But, at any rate, you can avoid this issue entirely (see my previous post).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K