Sakurai proof Wigner-Eckart theorem

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter detste
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Sakurai Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Wigner-Eckart theorem is proven in Sakurai's "Modern Quantum Mechanics" (Revised edition) on page 240, specifically through the relationship between equations (3.10.35) and (3.10.36). The deduction is based on the similarity of the recursion relations for the Tq(k) matrix elements and the Clebsch-Gordon (CG) coefficients. While the recursion relation provides the ratios of the matrix elements, it does not determine their absolute magnitudes, which are governed by an arbitrary scale factor. This scale factor is independent of the quantum numbers m, q, and m', ensuring consistency across all Tq(k) matrix elements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Wigner-Eckart theorem
  • Familiarity with Clebsch-Gordon coefficients
  • Knowledge of recursion relations in quantum mechanics
  • Proficiency in quantum mechanics terminology and notation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Wigner-Eckart theorem in detail
  • Examine the properties and applications of Clebsch-Gordon coefficients
  • Explore recursion relations in quantum mechanics and their implications
  • Investigate the significance of scale factors in quantum matrix elements
USEFUL FOR

Quantum mechanics students, physicists specializing in angular momentum theory, and researchers interested in the mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics will benefit from this discussion.

detste
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
On page 240 in Sakurai's book "Modern Quantum Mechanics" (Revised edition) you can find a proof of the Wigner-Eckart theorem. I don't understand how you can deduce equation (3.10.36) from equation (3.10.35). I also don't understand why this proportionality factor is independent of m, q and m'. Can someone clarify this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well first of all, 3.10.36 follows from 3.10.35 because the recursion relation for the Tq(k) matrix elements is the same as the recursion relation for the Clebsch-Gordon coefficients.

The recursion relation for the CG coefficients gives us the ratio between any two CG coefficients. But there is nothing which dictates their absolute magnitudes (aside from an arbitrary convention). If the Tq(k) matrix elements are known to follow the same recursion relation, then we know the ratios between all of them, too, and these ratios are exactly the same as those between the CG coefficients. However, the absolute magnitude of these matrix elements is not dictated by the recursion relation, and the absolute magnitude need not be equal to that of the CG coefficient. Thus the only difference that can exist between the Tq(k) matrix elements and the CG coefficients is an overall scale factor (by overall I mean the same scale factor relates all Tq(k) matrix elements with their associated CG coefficient.)

Now since the CG coefficient recursion relation dictates all of the CG coefficients (not just for a given m, q, or m'), then this overall scale factor must not depend on m, q, or m'.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K