Sampling Rate in AD Converters: Samples vs. Signals

  • Thread starter Thread starter Femme_physics
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the terminology used in analog-to-digital (AD) converters, specifically the distinction between "samples" and "signals." Participants explore whether these terms are interchangeable and how they relate to the functioning of AD converters, including aspects of sampling rates and signal processing.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether "samples" should be referred to as "signals," suggesting that the terminology may be misleading in the context of electronics.
  • Others clarify that a sample represents an instantaneous value of a signal, while the entire input is considered a signal, indicating that the terms have distinct meanings.
  • One participant explains that the sampling rate refers to how many samples are taken per second, emphasizing that this is a critical specification for AD converters.
  • Another participant notes that the sampling rate cannot be equated with the signal rate, as ADCs may have specified input bandwidths that differ from the sampling rate.
  • Some contributions highlight that all varying voltage values are considered signals, and a series of samples derived from a continuous signal can also be described as a signal, albeit with specific characteristics due to the modulation process.
  • A participant discusses the historical context of sampling oscilloscopes, illustrating how samples were used to represent high-frequency signals in the past.
  • There is mention of the importance of timing in the ADC process, with a focus on how samples must be associated with specific time values to ensure accurate digital representation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interchangeability of the terms "samples" and "signals," with no consensus reached on this matter. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these terms in the context of AD converters.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight that the definitions of "samples" and "signals" depend on specific contexts and applications, indicating that assumptions about their meanings may vary. Additionally, the discussion touches on the complexities of sampling rates, input bandwidths, and the timing of digital values, which are not fully resolved.

Femme_physics
Gold Member
Messages
2,548
Reaction score
1
The word "sample"...

In AD converters it said that:

The sampling rate - Controls how many samples are taken per second

Shouldn't the word be signals instead of samples? Are they interchangeable? The word sample is a bit odd-sounding to me in the case of electronics.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org


Sample means a portion of a signal which would be OK for an A to D converter since the A-D conversion captures a voltage for just a small instant in time.

The whole input would be considered a signal, but the A-D converter converts this into many digital samples.
 


I don't know much about this but you can take an analogue signal and it digitise it by taking samples(bits) of that signal at regular intervals of time.The sampling rate is the number of samples taken per second.
 


vk6kro said:
Sample means a portion of a signal which would be OK for an A to D converter since the A-D conversion captures a voltage for just a small instant in time.

The whole input would be considered a signal, but the A-D converter converts this into many digital samples.


Ahh..many thanks for the clarification!
 


Usually ADC capture the value at the input at either on the rising or falling edge of the clock. Say the ADC is capturing the input on the rising edge ( positive edge trigger), every time the clock rising edge, the ADC capture the data and output as binary bits. Sampling rate is a specification of the rate ( frequency) of the clock.

For example if the ADC spec max sampling rate is 1MHz and no minimum. That means you can clock the ADC up to 1MHz, which means you that take up to 1 mega samples per second.

Signal is usually refer to the input of the ADC to be capture. Sample rate cannot be the same as signal rate as you ask. ADC usually has a specified input bandwidth that is not necessary the same as sample rate( clock rate). I worked with a lot of ADCs and some of them have signal bandwidth much higher than sampling rate. We actually test that. Hope this clarify a little for you.
 


A Sample is instantaneous value of a quantity, whereas a signal is the evolution of a quantity in time domain.
 


All varying voltage values are "signals". A string of samples, derived from a continuous signal, is still a 'signal'. The fact that this signal is a string of samples, makes it special, though because it is the result of a Modulation process and we just describe it as 'samples'. All streams of digits in a circuit are also analogue 'signals' of course.
But 'sampling' is a different issue from Analogue to digital conversion, which also involves Quantising the information contained in the original signal.
In the 'Old Days', when we didn't have the luxury of digital processing, they used 'Sampling Oscilloscopes', which could produce an analogue display of a very high frequency signal (up in the GHz region) by sampling it at a low frequency with a stream of very short pulses. You needed to have a repeating HF signal and to sample at the appropriate rate but the 'scope gave you picture of the HF signal as a set of analogue samples. This was extreme sub-sampling and you had to be extremely careful in interpreting the display, of course but my point is that they were Analogue Samples.

If you want to convert an analogue signal to a digital one then the digital values need to be associated with particular time values on the signal. Hence, you 'sample' the continuous analogue signal and then convert that sample value. If you don't do that then your ADC process may get confused. There are all sorts of ADC methods but they all take time to deliver a value, in between sample times you could imagine all sorts of weird combinations coming out of 8 parallel bits. You need a 'clock' to sort all this timing out. Even if you don't actually use analogue pre-sampling, it is still important that the timing of the digital values is consistent with the timing of the values of the original analogue signal.

BTW, it is not necessary to sample at a regular rate as long as the reconstruction equipment (DAC) knows the timings of the individual samples (and as long as the sample spacing is narrow enough to satisfy the Nyquist criterion for that portion of the signal). A lot of bit reduction methods involve this strategy, aamof.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K