Satellite Clocks: General & Special Relativity Time Variations

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

GPS satellites must adjust their clocks to account for relativistic time variations, specifically -7 microseconds/day due to Special Relativity (SR) and +45 microseconds/day due to General Relativity (GR). Both relativistic effects are significant, and while GR can handle velocity-related time dilation, it is common to treat them as separate corrections for precision applications like GPS. The time dilation for a clock in circular orbit can be calculated using the equation T = t / √(1 - (2GM)/(rc²) - (v²)/(c²)), where r is the radius of the orbit and v is the orbital velocity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of General Relativity (GR) and Special Relativity (SR)
  • Familiarity with GPS technology and its operational principles
  • Basic knowledge of orbital mechanics and equations of motion
  • Mathematical proficiency in calculus and algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the effects of General Relativity on satellite clock synchronization
  • Learn about the mathematical derivation of time dilation in circular orbits
  • Explore the GPS error analysis related to relativistic corrections
  • Investigate the implications of relativistic effects in other satellite systems
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, aerospace engineers, GPS system developers, and anyone interested in the practical applications of relativity in satellite technology.

Zack K
Messages
166
Reaction score
6
Something that crossed my mind recently; I know that satellites have to adjust their clock due to their relativistic time variations in relation to us. I was wondering do they adjust their times in accordance to general relativity or special relativity or both? Or is their speed so insignificant since they are traveling way too slow for special relativity to be factored in. If the former is the case, how would one go about and add the time dilation due to special and general relativity? Is it just a simple addition of the time dilation due to both gravity and speed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Zack K said:
Something that crossed my mind recently; I know that satellites have to adjust their clock due to their relativistic time variations in relation to us. I was wondering do they adjust their times in accordance to general relativity or special relativity or both? Or is their speed so insignificant since they are traveling way too slow for special relativity to be factored in. If the former is the case, how would one go about and add the time dilation due to special and general relativity? Is it just a simple addition of the time dilation due to both gravity and speed?
GPS satellites need to account for -7 microseconds/day due to SR (motion) and +45 microseconds/day due to GR (gravity):
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Error...tioning_System#Special_and_General_Relativity

Remember, Google is your friend.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Zack K
Zack K said:
I know that satellites have to adjust their clock due to their relativistic time variations in relation to us. I was wondering do they adjust their times in accordance to general relativity or special relativity or both?
I think what you probably intend to ask is if there is a correction needed for gravitational time dilation and a separate correction for velocity-related time dilation. The answer is that it depends how you want to look at it. It is perfectly possible to just use GR tools to calculate the appropriate correction to clock rates for a clock in a particular orbit without considering it as two separate elements. So you could say "no". Alternatively, you could split the correction into a correction for gravitational time dilation and a correction for velocity-related time dilation (as I see @phinds has done) and handle them separately, in which case the answer is "yes" - although I would say that it's a mistake to call the former a GR correction and the latter an SR correction because that would imply that GR doesn't handle velocity-related time dilation. It does.

Note that satellites in general don't bother. It's only where a really high precision clock measurement is needed - i.e., the GPS system - that anyone makes such a correction.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: David Lewis and Zack K
Ibix said:
... I would say that it's a mistake to call the former a GR correction and the latter an SR correction because that would imply that GR doesn't handle velocity-related time dilation. It does.
I agree. I was being simplistic for a first-cut answer.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Zack K, Ibix and russ_watters
the correction is to be implemented in the user's device when the calculation of the position is being performed
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Zack K
Zack K said:
Something that crossed my mind recently; I know that satellites have to adjust their clock due to their relativistic time variations in relation to us. I was wondering do they adjust their times in accordance to general relativity or special relativity or both? Or is their speed so insignificant since they are traveling way too slow for special relativity to be factored in. If the former is the case, how would one go about and add the time dilation due to special and general relativity? Is it just a simple addition of the time dilation due to both gravity and speed?
The equation for time dilation for a clock in circular orbit(as measured by a distant observer) is:
$$ T = \frac{t}{\sqrt{1-\frac{3GM}{rc^2}}}$$
where r is the radius of the orbit.
This could also be expressed as
$$ T = \frac{t}{\sqrt{1-\frac{2GM}{rc^2}- \frac{GM}{rc^2}}}$$
Orbital velocity for a circular orbit is:
$$ v = \sqrt{\frac{GM}{r}}$$
Thus
$$ \frac{GM}{r} = v^2$$

Substitute into the second equation and you get:
$$ T = \frac{t}{\sqrt{1-\frac{2GM}{rc^2}- \frac{v^2}{c^2}}}$$

For a non-circular orbit, you would have to add another term under the radical which contains the radial motion component of the orbital velocity at the point of the orbit you are interested in.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Zack K

Similar threads

  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • · Replies 79 ·
3
Replies
79
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K