Satellite Motion Homework: Find 2nd Satellite Speed

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around calculating the speed of a second satellite in a circular orbit around an unknown planet, given the first satellite's speed of 1.70 × 104 m/s and its orbital radius of 5.25 × 106 m. The user correctly applied the formula v = sqrt(GM / r) to find the planet's mass as 2.274 × 1025 kg. However, the calculated speed for the second satellite with a radius of 8.60 × 106 m was incorrectly stated as 1.3 × 104 m/s instead of the expected 1.3 × 10-7 m/s, leading to confusion regarding the answer key's accuracy. The consensus is that the numerical factor is correct, but the order of magnitude discrepancy indicates a potential error in the answer key.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Kepler's Laws of Planetary Motion
  • Familiarity with gravitational equations, specifically v = sqrt(GM / r)
  • Basic arithmetic and algebra skills for solving equations
  • Knowledge of orbital mechanics and satellite motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Review Kepler's Laws of Planetary Motion for deeper insights
  • Practice calculations using the formula v = sqrt(GM / r) with different orbital radii
  • Investigate common errors in orbital speed calculations
  • Explore the implications of mass and radius on satellite speed in various gravitational fields
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on orbital mechanics, as well as educators looking for examples of satellite motion problems and their solutions.

ThePiGeek314
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A satellite is in a circular orbit around an unknown planet. The satellite has a speed of 1.70 × 104 m/s, and the radius of the orbit is 5.25 × 106 m. A second satellite also has a circular orbit around this same planet. The orbit of this second satellite has a radius of 8.60 × 106 m. What is the speed of the second satellite?

Homework Equations



Kepler's Laws of Planetary Motion -- T2/r3 = 4pi2 / GM

v = sqrt (GM / r)

The Attempt at a Solution



There really isn't much conceptual work involved in this, so I might just be making an arithmetic mistake somewhere. But I've worked the problem out three times and gotten the same (wrong) answer every time...

I used the v = sqrt (GM / r) -- plugged the values in for the first satellite and solved for the planet's mass which must be 2.274 x 1025 kg.

Then I used that mass value for M in the same equation, switching out the radius value for the second satellite. I get that v = 1.3 x 104.

But the answer is 1.3 x 10-7.

Why is my answer so far off? Is the problem with the planet mass value or just in the calculations for the second satellite's speed? I think my process is right.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
ThePiGeek314 said:
But the answer is 1.3 x 10-7.
This is clearly a typo in the answer key. There's no way orbital speed just barely higher would be 11 orders of magnitude lower.
The numerical factor of 1.3 matches, so you're good there, and by eyeballing the distances involved the order of magnitude should be the same for both satellites - i.e. 10E4.
 
Thanks! I did wonder about the small difference in the orbit radii, but wasn't sure if I was missing something.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K