Satellite orbit question: does mass affect this problem?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving a synchronous satellite in a circular orbit above the Earth's equator. Participants are exploring the relationship between the satellite's mass and its orbital characteristics, specifically the height of the satellite above the Earth's surface.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to derive the height of the satellite using gravitational equations and orbital mechanics. Some participants question the relevance of the satellite's mass in the calculations, while others suggest considering the combined mass of the Earth and satellite.

Discussion Status

Participants have shared their calculations and findings, with some confirming the original poster's results. There is an ongoing exploration of the assumptions made regarding mass and its effect on the orbital dynamics, particularly in relation to the center of mass concept.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the negligible effect of the satellite's mass compared to the Earth's mass in the context of the problem, which may influence the interpretation of the results.

N_L_
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
I think I have an answer for the following problem, but I'm not sure if it (or the assumptions used to get it) are correct:

Consider a 540 kg synchronous satellite in a circular orbit in the same plane as our equator. Find the height H of the satellite above the Earth's equator.


What I got:

msat - mass of satellite = 540 kg
mearth - mass of Earth = 5.98 x 10^24 kg
r = radius = distance between Earth's center and the satellite = r
G = 6.67 x 10^-11 (N m^2 / kg^2)
v = velocity of the satellite
a = acceleration for uniform circular motion
radius Earth = 6380 km


F = ma
a = v^2 / r

G (msat * mearth) / r^2 = msat ( v^2 / r )

v = (2*pi*r) / T

T = 1 day = 86,400 seconds

substituting...and cancelling msat on both sides

G (mearth / r^2 ) = (2*pi*r)^2 / (r T^2 )

Re-arranging...

r^3 = ( G*mearth*T^2 ) / (4*pi^2)

r^3 = 7.54 x 10^22 meters cubed.

r = 4.23 X 10^7 meters or 42,300 km


total radius - Earth radius = height above the Earth's surface

42,300 km - 6,380 km = 35,920 km or 35,920,000 meters above the Earth's surface
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Mass does not affect it.

I got the same answer as you. Google also has the same answer.
 
Thank you.
 
Since you did ask whether "mass affects this problem," you should know that the equations you set up assume that mass doesn't matter by taking the Earth to be stationary. If you were to do the problem a little more carefully, the Earth and the satellite would revolve about their center of mass.

You would then find that the mass appearing in the equation you wrote for the period would contain the combined mass of the Earth and satellite (instead of just the Earth's mass) so then, yes, the mass of the satellite contributes to the period.

Of course, for the problem at hand, the mass of the satellite is so small compared with the mass of the Earth that the difference it makes in calculating the geosynchronous radius is entirely negligible.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
37
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K