Satellite Orbiting: Understanding the Concept

  • Thread starter Thread starter SecretSnow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Concept Satellite
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the mechanics of satellite orbits, specifically the relationship between launch speed, gravitational forces, and the curvature of the Earth. It is established that an object must be launched with sufficient tangential velocity to achieve a circular orbit, as gravity acts as a centripetal force, constantly changing the object's direction. The concept of escape velocity is clarified, indicating that if an object exceeds this speed, it can enter elliptical or parabolic trajectories. The conversation also highlights the importance of launch angles and the distinction between launching to escape Earth's gravity versus achieving orbit.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational forces and centripetal acceleration
  • Familiarity with the concept of escape velocity
  • Knowledge of orbital mechanics and trajectory analysis
  • Basic physics principles related to motion and forces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the equations for escape velocity, specifically Ve=√(2GM/R)
  • Explore the differences between circular and elliptical orbits in orbital mechanics
  • Learn about the role of launch angles in achieving desired orbital paths
  • Investigate the effects of atmospheric drag on satellite trajectories
USEFUL FOR

Aerospace engineers, physics students, and anyone interested in the principles of satellite dynamics and orbital mechanics will benefit from this discussion.

SecretSnow
Messages
66
Reaction score
0
Hi guys, I'm confused when my textbook (or actually most other explanations) says that when an object is launched at a speed high enough, it orbits the Earth circularly because the Earth beneath CURVES away from it.

First thing first, I'll start by visualizing the Earth is stationary and don't rotate. This is for the sake of making things simpler first. If I throw a ball at a high speed, it will eventually reach the ground. If the speed is very high, the ball will "escape" from Earth.
Right?

To complicate things further, when the Earth rotates, it will orbit. One thing is, does the Earth rotate faster than the ball's orbiting speed? The text does not mention it :( . If it does, how does it go into orbit? Even if the Earth curves away, wouldn't it still fall down?

I'm thinking that if the speed is high enough, the ball can reach up quite high till there is sufficient space for it to orbit. Because at lower heights, it will eventually collide onto the ground although it wants to orbit circularly. At higher heights, this is then possible.

What has it got to do with curving anyway? And I find the diagrams given by textbooks are peculiar. For instance, the Earth rotates sideways but object is launched from places like North Pole to South Pole, vertical orbit when the rotation is horizontal. What difference would it even make then?

By the way, is the orientation for launching an object to escape Earth and launching an object to orbit the same? Is it upwards and tangentially respectively?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello, SecretSnow.

Have you seen animations like this or this?

If you want to put a ball into circular orbit by throwing it with some initial velocity and then letting gravity take over from that point, you must launch the ball from a point on the circular orbit and with a velocity that is tangent to the circular orbit.

When a spacecraft is launched from the surface of the earth, then rockets are used to propel the spacecraft for some period of time to get the spacecraft into the proper initial position and velocity for circular orbit.
 
SecretSnow said:
Hi guys, I'm confused when my textbook (or actually most other explanations) says that when an object is launched at a speed high enough, it orbits the Earth circularly because the Earth beneath CURVES away from it.

First thing first, I'll start by visualizing the Earth is stationary and don't rotate. This is for the sake of making things simpler first. If I throw a ball at a high speed, it will eventually reach the ground. If the speed is very high, the ball will "escape" from Earth.
Right?
You are misreading your original statement. The satellite orbits because the earch CURVES away from it. That has nothing to do with the Earth rotating. If you throw a ball straight up then, ignoring the fact that gravitational acceleration drops off as r2, it will eventually fall back to the earth. If you throw it at an angle rather than straight up, where it hits the Earth will depend upon its speed. Because the Earth curves (not "rotates") you can (theoretically) throw the ball fast enough that the distance it travels before it hits the Earth is greater than the circumference of the earth.

To complicate things further, when the Earth rotates, it will orbit. One thing is, does the Earth rotate faster than the ball's orbiting speed? The text does not mention it :( . If it does, how does it go into orbit? Even if the Earth curves away, wouldn't it still fall down?
That depends upon the height at which you want the satellite to orbit. The greater the radius of the orbit, the slower the orbital speed can be.

I'm thinking that if the speed is high enough, the ball can reach up quite high till there is sufficient space for it to orbit. Because at lower heights, it will eventually collide onto the ground although it wants to orbit circularly. At higher heights, this is then possible.
Are you thinking of firing straight up or at an angle?

What has it got to do with curving anyway? And I find the diagrams given by textbooks are peculiar. For instance, the Earth rotates sideways but object is launched from places like North Pole to South Pole, vertical orbit when the rotation is horizontal. What difference would it even make then?
Again, you seem to be confusing "curving" with "rotating". If the surface of the Earth were an infinitely large plane, then no matter how high or at what angle you launched an object, it would land somewhere. Since it is not, if you launch it high enough with sufficient angle, it will "miss" the surface of the earth.

By the way, is the orientation for launching an object to escape Earth and launching an object to orbit the same? Is it upwards and tangentially respectively?
What do you mean by "escape the earth"? Theoretically, it wouldn't make any difference. It should be solely the "vertical" component that adds to "escape velocity"- which is discussed in your other thread: https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=662201
 
Oh I think i got it already! The animations are very useful, I can't find them elsewhere lol.

So I misunderstood the meaning of 'curve'.. I see. Actually after watching the animation, am I still right to say that there must be enough space for the satellite to orbit? I'm thinking that, when the satellite is launched tangentially with respect to the Earth (assuming it's a sphere), it should by right continue to move in a straight line if there is no gravity. Because there is gravity, there is a force acting downwards of the object towards the centre of the Earth (centripetal acceleration) and this causes the satellite to change its direction constantly and enter uniform circular motion. Gravity does not aim to make objects trying to orbit to stay on the ground as much as it wanting to let objects change their direction.

If it is at low speeds below escape speed, it will collide on to the ground eventually as it tries to orbit (correct?). At speeds above the escape speed, the satellite will travel a horizontal distance far enough away from the ground to have enough space to orbit. Can i say this??

However, why would some satellites travel in ellipses instead of a circle?? Thanks a lot people, you've been a great help! :smile:
 
You can get different kinds of orbits if you change the critical velocity, because it is related to the escape velocity of the object. :)
 
MrWarlock616 said:
You can get different kinds of orbits if you change the critical velocity, because it is related to the escape velocity of the object. :)

I see. But what is the physics behind it?
 
SecretSnow said:
I see. But what is the physics behind it?

Ve=√(2GM/R)=Vc√2.
So, if the kinetic energy you supply to the satellite is more than what's required for a circular orbit, it will move in an elliptical orbit or even a parabolic path where it leaves the earth.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K