donglepuss
- 17
- 4
i'll start:
1/(1-0.999...)
1/(1-0.999...)
The discussion centers around Rayo's Number, which is proposed as the largest finite number, contrasting it with Graham's Number, historically recognized as the largest number used in a mathematical paper. Participants highlight the conceptual challenges of defining and comparing such large numbers, emphasizing that Graham's Number is so vast it cannot be expressed within the observable universe. The conversation also touches on the philosophical implications of infinity and the triviality of simply inventing larger numbers without mathematical rigor.
PREREQUISITESMathematicians, students of mathematics, and enthusiasts interested in the concepts of large numbers and their philosophical implications.
fresh_42 said:I'll skip to the end: Ben Gurion!
http://www.ephraimkishon.de/en/my_favorite_stories.htm
1/(1-0.999...) +1donglepuss said:i'll start:
1/(1-0.999...)
Bogus, since 9-bar is exactly 1 so you are dividing by zero. Why not just say infinity, since that's what you wrote?donglepuss said:i'll start:
1/(1-0.999...)
Two philosophers getting drunk in a bar and one asks the other.donglepuss said:i'll start:
1/(1-0.999...)
Here is the man himself explaining where it came from.DaveC426913 said:1/(1-0.999...) +1
The problem is that it is s trivial game if all you have to do is make up a number.
That's why I'm a fan of Grahams Number, which was (for a time) the largest number ever used in a math paper.
Its so large that it cannot be written out in the volume of the observable universe. In fact, the number that represents the number of digits in Grahams number is so large, it cannot be written out in the volume of the known universe.
Is this the biggest? Rayo's number?donglepuss said:i'll start:
1/(1-0.999...)