Scaling Augmented Matrices: Is My Thinking Correct?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

Scaling an augmented matrix by a non-zero scalar preserves the solution set, as it effectively performs elementary row operations on each row. This is confirmed through the equivalence of the augmented matrix representation and the corresponding system of equations. However, multiplying the coefficient matrix without scaling the right-hand side alters the solution set, leading to incorrect results. The relationship holds true for any invertible matrix A, where multiplying both sides of the equation Ax = b by a scalar does not change the solution vector x.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of augmented matrices and their representation of linear equations
  • Familiarity with elementary row operations in linear algebra
  • Knowledge of matrix equations and vector solutions
  • Concept of invertible matrices and their properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of augmented matrices in linear algebra
  • Learn about elementary row operations and their effects on solution sets
  • Explore the implications of scaling matrices in linear equations
  • Investigate the concept of matrix invertibility and its applications
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those focusing on linear algebra, as well as anyone interested in understanding the behavior of augmented matrices and their solutions.

jeremy222
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
An augmented matrix scaled by a number also means the solutions set is scaled by that same number. I believe this is true due to it basically being the same as elementary row operations preformed on each row. Unless it is a zero scalar in which case you lose all conditions. Is my method of thinking about this correct? Its not homework but I think it would help me understand a concept.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, that's not true. If you have an augmented matrix, say
[tex]\begin{bmatrix}a & b & c & j \\ d & e & f & k \\ g & h & i & l\end{bmatrix}[/tex]
That is equivalent to the three equations ax+ by+ cz= j, dx+ ey+ fz= k, gx+ hy+ iz= l.
It is also equivalent to the matrix equation
[tex]\begin{bmatrix}a & b & c \\ d & e & f \\ g & h & i \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}x \\ y \\ z\end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix}j \\ k \\ l\end{bmatrix}[/tex]

"Scaling" the augmented matrix by a number, multiplying every row by that number, gives multiples of the same equations which have the same solutions. If you multiply the coefficient matrix in the second form by a constant, but not the right hand side, that will divide the soluutions by the number.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
one can look at the 1x1 case:

[a][x] =

if we multiply by 2, let's say, we get:

[2a][x] = [2b].

suppose a ≠ 0. then in either case, we find:

x = b/a, the solution to the 2nd equation is NOT x = 2(b/a).

it is exactly the same for

Ax = b, where A is a matrix, and b is a vector.

if A is invertible, x = A-1b.

and 2Ax = 2b has the same vector solution.

in other words, multiplying an equation on both sides by a number,

doesn't change the solution set for that equation.

if ax + by + cz = d, then for any number m:

m(ax + by + cz) = md, for the same x,y and z.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
9K
  • · Replies 48 ·
2
Replies
48
Views
7K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K