Scaling Equations Homework: MKS Units & Time Scaling

  • Thread starter Thread starter ACE_99
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Scaling
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a differential equation describing undamped mechanical vibrations, specifically the equation x′′ + Kx = 0. Participants are exploring the MKS units for the constant K and the concept of time scaling using a characteristic time T.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the MKS units for K, with some reasoning through the units of distance, time, and their derivatives. Questions arise about the implications of scaling time and how to simplify the equation by introducing a non-dimensional variable.

Discussion Status

There is a productive exchange regarding the units of K, with some participants confirming that K has units of 1/s². Guidance is offered on how to approach the time scaling aspect, with suggestions to relate T to the periodic nature of the solutions.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the concept of scaling and non-dimensionalization, indicating a need for further clarification on these topics. The discussion is framed within the constraints of a homework assignment, focusing on understanding rather than providing direct solutions.

ACE_99
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Many undamped mechanical vibrations are described by the Differential Equation

x′′ + Kx = 0

that describes a position x(t) with t being time and K a positive constant.

a) What are the MKS units for K?
b) Introduce s=t/T for some characteristic time T to be determined (i.e. scale time) to make the equation for x(s) as simple as possible.


The Attempt at a Solution


Im not sure where to start with this problem. Any help would be greatly appreciated. I am also having some problems understanding scaling (non-dimentionalization) so If some one could help with that to it would be great.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, I can see that if you cannot do this problem, you must be completely stumped by scaling! Think about the other parts of the equation. "x" is a distance so is measured (in MKS units) in meters. "t" is a time so is measured in seconds. The derivative is a limit of the "difference quotient", (x(t+h)- x(t))/h and since h is added to t, is a time, measured in seconds itself. That derivative has units of meters/seconds. Which makes sense because the derivative of distance with respect to time is "speed". You can argue the same way again: the second derivative is the derivative of the first which involves the difference quotient (x'(t+h)- x'(t))/h, (m/s)/s= m/s2. Or you can just think "second derivative of distance with respect to time is acceleration so it has units of m/s2.

That means your equation, in terms of its units is
x" (m/s2)+ k (?) x (m)= 0.
Of course, to be able to add those and get 0, the two parts, x" and kx, must have the same units. m/s2= ?*m. What must ? be to make that true?
 
So ? should be 1/s2. Making the units of k 1/s2
 
Yes. Notice also that that is almost the "spring equation". Multiplying by m, mx"+ mkx= 0 or mx"= -mk x which says "mass times acceleration" = "force"= -"spring constant times distance stretched. The spring constant, of course is given by "Newtons per meter". Since a Newton is 1 kg m/s2, "Newtons per meter" is just kg/s2 and taking out the kg again, leaves k in terms of 1/s2.
 
Great that helps me with one part of the question. Any tips on the time scale part?
 
About the only way you can "simplify" this is to get rid of that constant, K. If you take s= t/T, then dx/dt= dx/ds (ds/dt)= (1/T)dx/ds. d2x/dt2= d(x')dt= (1/T2)d2x/ds2. Put that into the equation and see what T must be in order to cancel K.

Since the solutions to this equation (for K positive) will be periodic, an obvious choice of time interval would be the period. Is the T you got above related to the period of the solutions?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K