Scanning Tunnelling Microscope (STM)

Click For Summary
The Scanning Tunnelling Microscope (STM) measures the density of states of materials by analyzing the tunnelling current between its probe tip and the surface being scanned. This tunnelling current is influenced by the number of states available for tunnelling at a specific bias, linking it to the density of states. The STM effectively performs spectroscopy, generating an "I vs. V" curve that reflects the relationship between current and bias potential, where the density of states is derived from the derivative of this curve. The discussion clarifies that density of states pertains to energy levels in a solid rather than isolated atoms, emphasizing the continuous nature of results obtained from solid-state systems. Understanding these principles is crucial for interpreting STM data accurately.
EIRE2003
Messages
107
Reaction score
0
''The Scanning Tunnelling Microscope probes the density of states of a material''...

What does this actually mean?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The signal from an STM is proportional to the tunnelling current between the tip of the probe and the surface that is being scanned.
Now, tunnelling current is of course proportional to the tunnelling propability which in turn is determined by -among other things- the number of states that are allowed to tunnell for a specfic bias, i.e. it is proportional to the density of states.
 
EIRE2003 said:
''The Scanning Tunnelling Microscope probes the density of states of a material''...

What does this actually mean?

It means that the STM is doing "spectroscopy" rather than imaging. It scans something resembling an "I vs. V", at a particular location of a material, where I is the current, and V is the bias potential between the STM tip and the material. The density of states (assuming you know what this is), is proportional to the the derivative of this curve, i.e. dI/dV vs. V.

Zz.
 
Ok, am I right in suggesting that the 'density of states' is, how closely packed the energy levels in an atom are, or is it how closely packed the energy levels in the material as a whole? That is, the energy gap between the valence band and the conduction band?
 
Your first definition of density of states is the more correct one. The density of states determines how closely packed (in energy space) the energy levels in a quantum mechanical system are.
 
EIRE2003 said:
Ok, am I right in suggesting that the 'density of states' is, how closely packed the energy levels in an atom are, or is it how closely packed the energy levels in the material as a whole? That is, the energy gap between the valence band and the conduction band?

Er... DOS is dN/dE, where N is the number of states per unit volume.

You can't really consider the "energy levels in an atom" when you're doing a STM on a solid. I'm sure I've mentioned this many times. A solid doesn't behave the same way as isolated atoms. That's why "solid state physics" isn't the same field of study as "atomic/molecular physics". An atom's "DOS" is meaningless because an atom has discrete energy levels, and thus a dN/dE operation would be strange. The DOS you get from an STM of a solid, such as a superconductor, gives a continuous result!

Zz.
 
Last edited:
I am slowly going through the book 'What Is a Quantum Field Theory?' by Michel Talagrand. I came across the following quote: One does not" prove” the basic principles of Quantum Mechanics. The ultimate test for a model is the agreement of its predictions with experiments. Although it may seem trite, it does fit in with my modelling view of QM. The more I think about it, the more I believe it could be saying something quite profound. For example, precisely what is the justification of...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K