Quantum Tunneling in a Scanning Tunneling Microscope

In summary, the scanning tunneling microscope works by measuring the tunneling current between a scanning tip and the surface of a sample. Quantum tunneling is the phenomenon that allows for this current to flow, even though it is separated by a vacuum. The voltage applied between the tip and the sample can be varied to study different energy scales and obtain more than just the surface topology. The discovery of quantum tunneling was necessary to understand and utilize this concept in the scanning tunneling microscope. Adjusting the voltage would not work because it would only result in a short circuit, not allowing for the sensitive tunnel current to flow.
  • #1
Jest
2
0
Hi! I have a physics presentation tomorrow where I have to explain how a scanning tunneling microscope works. I also have to explain what quantum tunneling is and how it is used in a scanning tunneling microscope. I've done some research on the internet and I think I have a basic grasp of quantum tunneling. However, I have no idea how it is applied in the scanning tunneling microscope. I would really appreciate it if someone could explain this to me.

I should probably also confirm whether my understanding of quantum tunneling is correct. I'll try to explain what I know in layman's terms, since that's how I'll be presenting it.
Quantum tunneling is the idea that an object, when colliding with a surface, has a very small chance of "tunneling" through the surface. For example, when throwing a tennis ball at a wall, there is a small chance that it will appear on the other side of the wall. This chance is VERY small (close to nil?) for large objects such as the tennis ball. However, for very small matter, such as electrons, quantum tunneling is realistic.

Does that sound about right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Yes, that is sort of correct. However, a more general way of thinking about it in this context to instead focus on potential barriers which do not necessarily have to be anything "physical"; in the most commons case this "barrier" is simply the energy difference between two stable configurations of a system (stable meaning it is an energy minimum).

An STM works by measuring the tunneling current as electrons tunnel between a scanning tip and the surface. Now, according to classical physics there shouldn't be any current flowing since the tip and surface are separated by a vacuum which creates a large barrier and blocks the current regardless of the applied voltage*.
However, the tunneling probability through this barrier is high enough to allow for a relatively large current which can quite easily be measured. The neat thing is that the magnitude of this current (which is proportional to the tunneling probability) depends upon the properties of the surface; you can also to some extent choose which energy scale you want to study by varying the voltage applied between the tip and the surface. Hence, an STM will give you more than just the topology the surface; you also get the density of states for "free".

Note that this kind of tunneling isn't very "exotic", one reason why it is so difficult to fabricate new microprocessors is that the distances in modern CMOS transistors are so small that the tunneling current becomes significant, it is effectively a leakage current which causes extra heating and Intel&co have to work hard to minimize the effects (by designing devices where the tunneling probability is as small as possible).
Hence, there quite a lot of tunneling going on inside your computer.



*the voltages involved are far too small to allow arcing
 
  • #3
Thank you very much. I actually understood that, so it was a big help.
 
  • #4
I don't understand why the discovery of quantum tunneling had to be made in order to make use of a concept such as the one that the scanning tunneling microscope uses.
For example, a STM scans surfaces and the electrons from the sample tunnel through the potential energy barrier of the space between the microscope's needle and the sample from the sample to the needle. Tunneling is needed because the potential energy of this "in between" space (between the analyzed sample and the needle) is greater than the energy that the electron obtains from the voltage between the needle and the sample (e.g. the potential of the in between space is 5eV and the energy the electron acquires is 2eV).
However, why can't the voltage simply be adjusted (e.g. by applying an external voltage to the needle) so that the electrons don't have to overcome any "barrier" but rather can enter the needle by classical theories (i.e. kinetic energy (e.g. 6eV) is greater than potential energy (e.g. 5eV))?
The needle would be held at a distance from the sample such that the current in the needle would remain constant and this would allow us to map out the surface of the sample.

What is the mistake I am making?


Thank you very much for your time.
 
  • #5
Is the ETM recording the image of the surface over time? Like a camera with the shudder left open for an extended period of time.
 
  • #6
theyuv said:
I don't understand why the discovery of quantum tunneling had to be made in order to make use of a concept such as the one that the scanning tunneling microscope uses.
For example, a STM scans surfaces and the electrons from the sample tunnel through the potential energy barrier of the space between the microscope's needle and the sample from the sample to the needle. Tunneling is needed because the potential energy of this "in between" space (between the analyzed sample and the needle) is greater than the energy that the electron obtains from the voltage between the needle and the sample (e.g. the potential of the in between space is 5eV and the energy the electron acquires is 2eV).
However, why can't the voltage simply be adjusted (e.g. by applying an external voltage to the needle) so that the electrons don't have to overcome any "barrier" but rather can enter the needle by classical theories (i.e. kinetic energy (e.g. 6eV) is greater than potential energy (e.g. 5eV))?
The needle would be held at a distance from the sample such that the current in the needle would remain constant and this would allow us to map out the surface of the sample.

What is the mistake I am making?Thank you very much for your time.

There is a difference between tunnel current, and ohmic current, which is basically what you tried to compare with. For one, ohmic current is nothing more than a simple "short",and you get your standard IV curve that you would get in a metal. However, a tunnel current is more sensitive than that and where you see a lot of features that would not happen. For example the potential barrier CAN be greater than the kinetic energy. In classical case, you see no current, but in a quantum mechanical tunneling, you can! Not only that, in cases where you have superconductor-insulator-superconductor tunnel junction, you may even get a very peculiar phenomenon of Josephson current, which occurs at ZERO potential difference! This effect is purely quantum mechanical with no classical analogue.

Zz.
 
Last edited:

Related to Quantum Tunneling in a Scanning Tunneling Microscope

1. What is quantum tunneling?

Quantum tunneling is a phenomenon in which particles are able to pass through potential energy barriers that would normally be impossible to penetrate according to classical physics. This is due to the probabilistic nature of particles at the quantum level.

2. How does quantum tunneling occur in a scanning tunneling microscope (STM)?

In an STM, a sharp metal tip is brought close to the surface of a sample. When a voltage is applied between the tip and the sample, it creates an electric field that allows electrons to tunnel between the tip and the surface. This tunneling current is measured and used to create an image of the surface.

3. What is the significance of quantum tunneling in STM imaging?

Quantum tunneling in STM allows for incredibly high resolution imaging of surfaces at the atomic level. The tip of the microscope can detect the slightest variations in the tunneling current, providing detailed information about the surface topography and electronic properties of the sample.

4. Are there any limitations to quantum tunneling in STM?

Yes, there are limitations to quantum tunneling in STM. The tunneling current is highly dependent on the distance between the tip and sample, so the sample must be conductive or coated with a conductive material. Additionally, the tip must be very sharp to achieve high resolution imaging, which can be difficult to maintain over time.

5. How is quantum tunneling in STM used in scientific research?

Quantum tunneling in STM is used in a variety of scientific research fields, including materials science, surface chemistry, and nanotechnology. It allows for precise imaging and manipulation of atoms and molecules on surfaces, providing valuable insight into their properties and behavior. STM has also been used to study quantum effects and phenomena, such as superconductivity and quantum interference.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
888
Replies
3
Views
934
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
797
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
6
Views
885
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
33
Views
3K
Back
Top