Schrodinger cat superperposition vs sharp state

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the Schrödinger's cat thought experiment, specifically addressing the concepts of superposition and the nature of quantum states. Participants explore the implications of the experiment, its feasibility, and the interpretations of quantum mechanics related to macroscopic systems.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that outside the box, the cat's state is in superposition, while inside the box, it is not, suggesting a clear distinction based on observation.
  • Others argue that the outcome of the experiment is certain and understood, asserting that the observable states of the cat are simply dead or alive, not a superposition.
  • A participant notes the difficulty of isolating the cat from its environment, implying that practical experimentation is more complex than it appears.
  • Another participant clarifies that Schrödinger's original intent was to highlight issues in quantum mechanics, not to suggest that the cat could exist in a superposition of states.
  • It is mentioned that the concept of quantum decoherence provides insight into why macroscopic superpositions do not manifest as expected.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the interpretation of the Schrödinger's cat experiment, with no consensus on whether the cat can be considered in a superposition or if it is definitively in one state when observed.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in understanding the implications of quantum mechanics, particularly regarding the definitions of states and the role of observation in determining outcomes. The discussion reflects ongoing debates in the interpretation of quantum theory.

GC2893
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
On the Schrödinger cat, can I simply say, outside the box,the state is in superposition,but inside the box, the state is not. Besides, the experiment is so simple to do, how come no body ever did it ?. Just put an animal you hate or even an inset, and observe the expected (50% -50%) result.

Another suggestion , instead of doing something bad , simply drop a candid to the hand of a human being inside when the isotope decay , and ask that person his experience when the box is open (what did your watch show when you received the candid, or you never receive a candid?)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Nobody did it because the outcome is certain and understood. Looking at a cat with a wave function half in the grave looks either dead or alive. It's wave function is not an observable and it's "observable" live or dead has only two values.
 
GC2893 said:
On the Schrödinger cat, can I simply say, outside the box,the state is in superposition,but inside the box, the state is not. Besides, the experiment is so simple to do, how come no body ever did it ?. Just put an animal you hate or even an inset, and observe the expected (50% -50%) result.

Problem is you cannot isolate the cat etc from the environment. If it were a simple experiment to do, I would have thought some people had done it by now. You have groups across the world who are designing experiments to test for macroscopic superposition, which need careful planning and set-up.
 
GC2893 said:
On the Schrödinger cat, can I simply say, outside the box,the state is in superposition,but inside the box, the state is not.

You cannot. The system is defined by its state, so it can only have one state.

However, you may be misunderstanding the Schrödinger's cat thought experiment. When Schrödinger proposed his thought experiment in 1935 he was not trying to suggest that the cat might be in a superposition of dead and alive; everyone agreed, then and now, that it would not. Whether we open the box or not, the cat is either dead or alive so opening the box just tells us which - it is no more mysterious than if I toss a coin and then have to look to see how it landed before I know if it's heads-up or tails-up. Schrödinger proposed his thought experiment to show that something was wrong with the then-current understanding of quantum mechanics: it did not explain why the cat would not end up a dead/alive superposition, even though that clearly did not happen.

It took several more decades to discover the solution: if the math is done correctly the dead/alive superposition won't appear. You can Google for "quantum decoherence" or for a less mathematically daunting explanation read David Lindley's book "Where does the weirdness go".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71 and bhobba

Similar threads

  • · Replies 143 ·
5
Replies
143
Views
12K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
9K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 46 ·
2
Replies
46
Views
7K