Schrodinger equation in position representation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the Schrödinger equation in position representation, specifically focusing on the Hamiltonian operator and its representation in terms of position and potential energy. Participants are examining the notation differences between the operators and their implications in quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the notation of the operators R and r, and their relationship in the context of the Hamiltonian. There is an exploration of how the potential V is represented in terms of these operators.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided clarifications regarding the relationship between the operators and their representations. There appears to be a productive exchange of ideas, with some understanding reached about the equivalence of the potential representations in position space.

Contextual Notes

There is a focus on the definitions and roles of the operators in the context of quantum mechanics, with specific attention to their application in position representation. The discussion reflects on the nuances of notation and its implications for understanding the underlying physics.

MatinSAR
Messages
673
Reaction score
204
Homework Statement
Derive schrodinger equation in position representation.
Relevant Equations
Schrodinger equation
Hello.

General form of the equaion is ## i \hbar \dfrac {\partial}{\partial t} | \psi (t) \rangle = \hat H | \psi (t) \rangle ##
According to my book ## \hat H ## in position space is ## - \dfrac {\hbar ^2}{2m} \nabla^2 + V( \hat {\vec R} , t)## so potensial V is a function of operator ##\hat R## and time ##t##. But in another page it used ##\hat V(\vec r , t ) ## instead, and I cannot understand why.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What are R and r in the text ?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MatinSAR
anuttarasammyak said:
What are R and r in the text ?
##\hat{R}## is a linear Hermitian operator corresponding to the observable ##\vec r##.
 
Thanks. In position presentation, applying operator R is multiplying its eigenvalue parameter r. e.g. a harmonic oscillator
\hat{V}=V(\hat{\mathbf{R}})=\frac{k}{2}\hat{\mathbf{R}}^2=\frac{k}{2}\mathbf{r}^2=V(\mathbf{r})=\hat{V}(\mathbf{r})
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MatinSAR
anuttarasammyak said:
Thanks. In position presentation, applying operator R is multiplying its eigenvalue parameter r. e.g. a harmonic oscillator
\hat{V}=V(\hat{\mathbf{R}})=\frac{k}{2}\hat{\mathbf{R}}^2=\frac{k}{2}\mathbf{r}^2=V(\mathbf{r})
Are you saying that ##\hat V(\mathbf r)## is same as ##V( \hat R)##?
 
Yes, in position representation.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MatinSAR
anuttarasammyak said:
Yes, in position representation.
I've just seen your edit in post #4. It's clear. Thank you for your time.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: anuttarasammyak

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K