Schrodinger equation in position representation

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the Schrödinger equation in position representation, specifically the form of the Hamiltonian operator, which includes a potential function V that depends on the position operator \(\hat{R}\) and time \(t\). Participants clarify that \(\hat{R}\) is a linear Hermitian operator corresponding to the observable \(\vec{r}\), and applying \(\hat{R}\) in position representation involves multiplying by its eigenvalue \(r\). The equivalence of \(\hat{V}(\mathbf{r})\) and \(V(\hat{R})\) in this context is confirmed. The conversation concludes with an acknowledgment of clarity achieved through the discussion. Understanding these relationships is crucial for applying quantum mechanics concepts effectively.
MatinSAR
Messages
673
Reaction score
204
Homework Statement
Derive schrodinger equation in position representation.
Relevant Equations
Schrodinger equation
Hello.

General form of the equaion is ## i \hbar \dfrac {\partial}{\partial t} | \psi (t) \rangle = \hat H | \psi (t) \rangle ##
According to my book ## \hat H ## in position space is ## - \dfrac {\hbar ^2}{2m} \nabla^2 + V( \hat {\vec R} , t)## so potensial V is a function of operator ##\hat R## and time ##t##. But in another page it used ##\hat V(\vec r , t ) ## instead, and I cannot understand why.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
What are R and r in the text ?
 
anuttarasammyak said:
What are R and r in the text ?
##\hat{R}## is a linear Hermitian operator corresponding to the observable ##\vec r##.
 
Thanks. In position presentation, applying operator R is multiplying its eigenvalue parameter r. e.g. a harmonic oscillator
\hat{V}=V(\hat{\mathbf{R}})=\frac{k}{2}\hat{\mathbf{R}}^2=\frac{k}{2}\mathbf{r}^2=V(\mathbf{r})=\hat{V}(\mathbf{r})
 
Last edited:
anuttarasammyak said:
Thanks. In position presentation, applying operator R is multiplying its eigenvalue parameter r. e.g. a harmonic oscillator
\hat{V}=V(\hat{\mathbf{R}})=\frac{k}{2}\hat{\mathbf{R}}^2=\frac{k}{2}\mathbf{r}^2=V(\mathbf{r})
Are you saying that ##\hat V(\mathbf r)## is same as ##V( \hat R)##?
 
Yes, in position representation.
 
anuttarasammyak said:
Yes, in position representation.
I've just seen your edit in post #4. It's clear. Thank you for your time.
 
  • Like
Likes anuttarasammyak