Schrodinger equation in the spherical coordinates

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the meaning and definitions of canonical momentum in spherical coordinates (r, theta, phi) within the context of quantum mechanics, particularly in relation to the Schrödinger equation and the Hydrogen atom problem. Participants explore the mathematical formulation and implications of these momenta.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the definitions and mathematical forms of the canonical momenta for theta and phi, noting their absence in the solution of the Hydrogen problem.
  • Another participant provides a definition of canonical momenta in terms of the Lagrangian and Hamiltonian, emphasizing the promotion of these momenta to derivative operators in quantum mechanics.
  • A further contribution reiterates the definitions of canonical momenta for the spherical coordinates, highlighting the dependence on the Lagrangian's form and the importance of non-degeneracy for quantization.
  • One participant asserts that the canonical momenta in spherical coordinates correspond to angular momentum components, suggesting a physical interpretation.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the role and significance of the canonical momenta in the context of the Hydrogen atom problem, indicating that multiple competing perspectives remain without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved aspects regarding the dependence of canonical momentum definitions on the specific form of the Lagrangian and the implications of non-degeneracy for quantization.

Quantum River
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
If using spherical coordinates (r, theta, phi) , what is the meaning of the canonical momentum of theta, phi? What are their definitions and mathematical form?

In solving the Hydrogen problem, one has not take into consideration P_theta and P_phi at all.

Quantum River
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Canonical momenta:

[tex]p_i \equiv \frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{q}_i}.[/tex]

So you have to get the Lagrangian out of the Hamiltonian, which is given by

[tex]L(q_i, \dot{q}_i) = \sum_i p_i q_i - H(p_i, q_i),[/tex]

where you substitute for [itex]\dot{q}_i[/itex] wherever you find a [itex]p_i.[/itex]

Remember that the canonical momenta in Q.M. are promoted to derivative operators, so that

[tex]p_\theta \rightarrow -i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial \theta}.[/tex]

This has to be because the canonical commutation relations hold for co-ordinates and their canonical momenta (since in classical mechanics, the corresponding relations hold for the Poisson bracket).

So these momenta do in fact appear in the Hamiltonian for the hydrogen atom: they usually appear as squared terms in the [itex]\nabla ^2[/itex] term (i.e. the kinetic energy).
 
Quantum River said:
If using spherical coordinates (r, theta, phi) , what is the meaning of the canonical momentum of theta, phi? What are their definitions and mathematical form?

In solving the Hydrogen problem, one has not take into consideration P_theta and P_phi at all.

Quantum River

[tex]p_{r}=:\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{r}}[/tex]

[tex]p_{\theta}=:\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{\theta}}[/tex]

[tex]p_{\phi}=:\frac{\partial L}{\partial \dot{\phi}}[/tex]

The form depends on the form of the lagrangian, of course. It's important the lagrangian be nondegenerate, else the quantization will be difficult.

Daniel.
 
Physically, the canonical momenta for spherical coordinates turns out to be angular momentum components.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K