Schwartz inequality proof over complex

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the Schwartz inequality for complex vectors, specifically the inequality |\langle a|b \rangle |^2 \leq \langle a|a \rangle \langle b|b \rangle. The proof begins with the vector |\psi\rangle = |a\rangle + c |b\rangle and utilizes the non-negativity of the inner product \langle \psi | \psi \rangle. The participants explore the implications of treating the quadratic form in the complex case and conclude that the inequality holds, with equality when the vectors |a\rangle and |b\rangle are parallel.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of inner product spaces over complex numbers
  • Familiarity with vector calculus in \mathbb{C}
  • Knowledge of quadratic forms and their properties
  • Experience with complex conjugates and real parts of complex numbers
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of inner product spaces in complex vector spaces
  • Learn about quadratic forms and their applications in proving inequalities
  • Explore the relationship between parallel vectors and equality conditions in the Schwartz inequality
  • Investigate the implications of complex coefficients in vector equations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone studying linear algebra or functional analysis, particularly those interested in complex vector spaces and inequalities.

jfy4
Messages
645
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Consider any two vectors, |a\rangle and |b\rangle. Prove the Schwartz inequality
<br /> |\langle a|b \rangle |^2 \leq \langle a|a \rangle \langle b|b \rangle<br />


Homework Equations


a basic understanding of vector calculus over \mathbb{C}...


The Attempt at a Solution


I wanted to do this proof almost the same way I do it over \mathbb{R}, except I'm not sure if I can follow through with the normal quadratic part...

I start with |\psi\rangle =|a\rangle + c |b\rangle and using the fact that \langle\psi | \psi \rangle \geq 0 I get
<br /> 0\leq \langle \psi | \psi \rangle = \langle a|a \rangle + c\langle a|b\rangle + c^{\ast}\langle b|a\rangle + |c|^2\langle b|b\rangle<br />
which can be written
<br /> 0\leq \langle a|a\rangle + 2\Re[c\langle a|b\rangle ] +|c|^2\langle b|b\rangle<br />
So I'm wondering if I can consider this quadratic in c and claim that
<br /> (2|\langle a|b\rangle |)^2-4\langle a|a\rangle \langle b|b\rangle \leq 0<br />

Any help would be appreciated, Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
so for the real case
0\leq \langle a|a\rangle + 2\Re[c\langle a|b\rangle ] +|c|^2\langle b|b\rangle

becomes
0\leq \langle a|a\rangle + c\langle a|b\rangle +c^2\langle b|b\rangle

however for the complex case, that simplification does not occur. so I'm not convinced you can treat the quadratic the same as both the complex parts of c & <a|b> will cause complication - that said I'm not that familiar with this method...

The way I've seen that works for a general inner product space is to write |b> in as a summation of components perpendicular and parallel to |a> and prove it direct form there
|b\rangle = \langle a|b \rangle|a \rangle + |z\rangle
 
Why do you think c must be complex? All the inner products you are using result in real numbers.
 
as the vectors are arbitrary <a|b> may be complex

now unless a constraint is put on c, then I would assume it can also be complex

now it is true that all the terms in the following expression are real, otherwise the inequality would not make sense
0 \leq \langle a|a\rangle + 2\Re[c\langle a|b\rangle ] +|c|^2\langle b|b\rangle

now say we set c to be from the reals, then the inequality becomes
0 \leq \langle a|a\rangle + 2c\Re[\langle a|b\rangle ] +|c|^2\langle b|b\rangle

this is a real quadratic in c, though I'm not sure how the part about Re{<a|b>} could be massaged into the required form?
 
Last edited:
If all else fails, split things into real and imaginary parts.
 
I think I got it, let
<br /> |\psi\rangle = |b\rangle - \frac{ \langle a|b\rangle }{\langle a|a\rangle }|a\rangle<br />
then
<br /> \begin{align}<br /> 0\leq \langle \psi|\psi\rangle &amp;= \left( \langle b|-\frac{\langle b|a\rangle}{\langle a|a\rangle}\langle a| \right) \left( |b\rangle -\frac{\langle a|b\rangle}{\langle a|a\rangle}|a\rangle \right) \\<br /> &amp;=\langle b|b\rangle - \frac{\langle a|b\rangle \langle b|a\rangle}{\langle a|a\rangle}<br /> \end{align}<br />
and the result clearly follows.

How does this look?
 
yep that's looking good to me

its worth noting the equality holds when |a> and |b> are parallel
 

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K