Schwinger Quantum action

  • Thread starter Thread starter mhill
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Quantum
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the application of the Schwinger quantum action in the context of path integrals, specifically examining the relationship between the path integral and variations in the action with respect to an external source J. It emphasizes the importance of integrating by parts and how the equations of motion for the scalar field φ are satisfied within the expectation value. Participants are encouraged to explore this concept using the Klein-Gordon scalar field and a φ^4 interaction, while also sharing their progress for collaborative assistance. The conversation highlights the need for a deeper understanding of functional derivatives in quantum field theory. Overall, the thread aims to clarify the mathematical foundations of quantum action principles.
mhill
Messages
180
Reaction score
1
Given the path integral

< -\infty | \infty > = N \int D[\phi ]e^{i \int dx (L+J \phi ) }

then , it would be true that (Schwinger)

\frac{\partial < -\infty | \infty >}{\partial J }= < -\infty |\delta \int L d^{4}x | \infty >

If so, could someone provide an exmple with the Kelin-gordon scalar field plus an interaction of the form \phi ^{4}
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a consequence of the fact that
\int\!\mathcal{D}\phi\, \frac{\delta}{\delta \phi} \left( \dots \right) = 0
Essentially, one integrates by parts and hopes that the exponential damps out the boundary in function space, if such a boundary exists. Thus, the equations of motion for \phi are obeyed inside the expectation value.

Anyway, using (space) integration by parts, write your action as
\int\!d^4x\, \frac{1}{2}\phi ( - \partial^2 - m^2 ) \phi + \frac{\lambda}{4!} \phi^4.
You should now be able to find the variation in this action just like taking ordinary derivatives. If you get stuck, tell us what you've done and we can see about help.

I hope someone doesn't just blurt out the answer. This forum seems to be full of keeners like that =)
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K