Cyrus
- 3,237
- 17
Astronuc said:
AHAHAHAHAHAHAH!
Astronuc said:
mbrmbrg said:Ummmm...
While I was gone, I didn't see any graphical banner ad thingies. I am mucho dissapointedo.
But this whole partnership with scientific american is too cool! Legitimacy at last! (ducks the frozen fish slap)
No offense intended but this particular change seems to me like a big step forward... :)Greg Bernhardt said:This is very significant. Scientific American (Sciam) has their own ad network which dishes out ad campaigns. Instead of using Google text ads we will be moving to Sciam's graphical ads. However, note, when no Sciam campaigns are running, you may see Google ads. This is in our best interest because Sciam has direct connections with top science and technology companies. Sciam also has high quality standards. We will no longer see crackpot theories advertised. And obviously this has the promise of higher revenue which help keep PF running and growing.
Look what I've found as the top ad at sciam.com/partners/:speaking about "no crackpot theories" remark, are you also going to filter out these out of google ads?
Gokul43201 said:In nearly all countries but the US (e.g., Canada, Singapore, Philippines, India, Australia, UK) PF enjoys a similar or much better page rank than sciam.com. Sciam has a lot to gain from this partnership too.
Scroll down to the bottom of the Alexa page - it shows traffic ranks in different countries.arivero said:I am interested on hearing how do you got such data?
Ok, you heard about Google's Pagerank, and now I'm telling you to forget about it again.Gokul43201 said:In nearly all countries but the US (e.g., Canada, Singapore, Philippines, India, Australia, UK) PF enjoys a similar or much better page rank than sciam.com. Sciam has a lot to gain from this partnership too.
You don't have to be an "insider" to know this kind of stuff. There are tools with which you can query different data centers so you can see what a website's Pagerank is across Google's servers. However claiming that a difference between data centers has any significance at all for a longer period of time is absolutely pointless as well. The copy of the web on some data centers is simply more current than the one on other data centers and after a while an update gets pushed across the entire network.arivero said:I am interested on hearing how do you got such data? Google insider, are you?
Oh God, Alexa. Do you even know how they calculate their data? People have to install the Alexa toolbar on their PCs and that toolbar sends out usage information. And the people who usually install this toolbar are webmasters, it has little to no value for anyone else. So all Alexa can tell you is how popular a given website is among webmasters.arivero said:Now, you are probably right. Alexa shows that PF is a good match to sciam, in fact better than the other new partners.
You bought a scientist from the USA? How did you get him through customs?_Mayday_ said:I bought my first American Scientist a few weeks back
akan said:Hello,
How do I claim the 20% discount?
Thank you!
Schrodinger's Dog said:https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=226363
Watch this space, GB, will be supplying a link presently.