Scientific American Partnership

  • Thread starter Thread starter Greg Bernhardt
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
Physics Forums has announced a partnership with Scientific American, enhancing its credibility and potential for growth. This collaboration will allow PF to utilize Scientific American's ad network, replacing Google text ads with more professional graphical ads, while maintaining high content standards. The partnership also includes a special partner page on Sciam's website and opportunities for content sharing, which could lead to increased visibility for PF. Concerns about changes to PF's identity are addressed, emphasizing that the forum will remain independent and focused on quality. The partnership is set to take effect on April 1st, marking a significant milestone for both organizations.
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Ooh! Cool :smile:
 
  • #33
(Im just kiddding about the subscription.) I hate getting mail and magazines because it just keeps piling up and up and up before I have time to read it. Id rather just read the website online. BTW they have a really nice looking website. Can we have a PF skin that follows the Sciam style? Its very GQ.
 
  • #34
Gosh, now I'm all curious about these Sciam ads... Wait! I've got it!
*runs away and comes back without logging in*
 
  • #35
Ummmm...
While I was gone, I didn't see any graphical banner ad thingies. I am mucho dissapointedo.
But this whole partnership with scientific american is too cool! Legitimacy at last! (ducks the frozen fish slap)
 
  • #36
mbrmbrg said:
Ummmm...
While I was gone, I didn't see any graphical banner ad thingies. I am mucho dissapointedo.
But this whole partnership with scientific american is too cool! Legitimacy at last! (ducks the frozen fish slap)

Nothing is setup quite yet, hopefully by the end of the week.
 
  • #37
Congratulations! :)
 
  • #38
omg, it really isn't an April Fool's gag.

Well, congrats!
 
  • #39
This is brilliant! I love Sciam, you can find it on most magazine stands in Delhi now. What kind of content will we see?

Congratulations!
 
  • #40
Here it is:

http://www.sciam.com/partners/
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #41
Greg Bernhardt said:
This is very significant. Scientific American (Sciam) has their own ad network which dishes out ad campaigns. Instead of using Google text ads we will be moving to Sciam's graphical ads. However, note, when no Sciam campaigns are running, you may see Google ads. This is in our best interest because Sciam has direct connections with top science and technology companies. Sciam also has high quality standards. We will no longer see crackpot theories advertised. And obviously this has the promise of higher revenue which help keep PF running and growing.
No offense intended but this particular change seems to me like a big step forward... :)

Congratulations to the PF crew.
 
  • #42
speaking about "no crackpot theories" remark, are you also going to filter out these out of google ads?
 

Attachments

  • pfsa.JPG
    pfsa.JPG
    28 KB · Views: 428
  • #43
Very Nice Job

I want to congratulate this event happening I am just a student but I will be a professional very soon. I strongly like the idea of merging with Sciam. To the best of the best!
 
  • #44
speaking about "no crackpot theories" remark, are you also going to filter out these out of google ads?
Look what I've found as the top ad at sciam.com/partners/:
http://vedic.by-choice.com/yagna/"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #45
No more crackpot theories. And I thought I was kicked off long ago.
Just when I have a real good 26d string cosmology.
yanniru
 
  • #46
As a casual reader of these forums, even I am excited about this.

Good job guys!
 
  • #47
Gokul43201 said:
In nearly all countries but the US (e.g., Canada, Singapore, Philippines, India, Australia, UK) PF enjoys a similar or much better page rank than sciam.com. Sciam has a lot to gain from this partnership too.

I am interested on hearing how do you got such data? Google insider, are you :biggrin: ?

Now, you are probably right. Alexa shows that PF is a good match to sciam, in fact better than the other new partners.

http://www.alexa.com/data/details/t...r3DCq5Mz04cC0DsqeqYfWQlw=&range=6m&size=Large

(btw: do we have stast "per forum"? Just curious)

It seems that the sciam audience depends a lot of the journal periodicity; its "lower support" is of the same order than PF, its higher reach triplicates it, and it is probably even better if you go to monthly-unique visits.

Quancast gives data for the USA market only. A pity.
PF is measured "over 311K U.S. monthly uniques." http://www.quantcast.com/physicsforums.com
sciam "reaches over 1.5 million monthly uniques, of which 1.0 million (68%) are in the U.S.".
 
  • #48
arivero said:
I am interested on hearing how do you got such data?
Scroll down to the bottom of the Alexa page - it shows traffic ranks in different countries.
 
  • #49
Publication

Sooooo. Does that mean if a post shows up in the Physics Forum that it can be claimed as published material?

/lol
 
  • #50
20% discount to Sciam subscriptions, and I just renewed mine for another 3 years.
 
  • #51
I bought my first American Scientist a few weeks back, has anyone read the artcile on CERN? I thought it was great, it explained it a lot better than other magazines I have found on the subject. Even these new articles in "news" on the forums look interesting, I can only see this being a good thing.

_Mayday_
 
  • #52
Congrats!

Hey there,

It's been ages since I was posting regularly on PF but I'm still subscribed and keep track of what's going on. I remember when the forum started and Greg was just a kid. I think from memory he was 16 or 17. It's great to see how things have gone and that it has gained such esteemed recognition.

Congrats Greg.

Raavin ;)
 
  • #53
Gokul43201 said:
In nearly all countries but the US (e.g., Canada, Singapore, Philippines, India, Australia, UK) PF enjoys a similar or much better page rank than sciam.com. Sciam has a lot to gain from this partnership too.
Ok, you heard about Google's Pagerank, and now I'm telling you to forget about it again.

Several years ago Pagerank was a huge determining factor in how websites were ranked, but this is not so anymore!

The quality of the link is much more important, making Pagerank as a quantifier of a website's success utterly useless. Spam one million guestbooks with your link and your website won't get anywhere near #1 in the search engine results pages. On the other hand, a couple of editorially given, highly relevant links will help you out a LOT.

Ok, now you can forget about Pagerank. Right now. Do it.

arivero said:
I am interested on hearing how do you got such data? Google insider, are you :biggrin: ?
You don't have to be an "insider" to know this kind of stuff. There are tools with which you can query different data centers so you can see what a website's Pagerank is across Google's servers. However claiming that a difference between data centers has any significance at all for a longer period of time is absolutely pointless as well. The copy of the web on some data centers is simply more current than the one on other data centers and after a while an update gets pushed across the entire network.

But let's forget Pagerank ever existed, shall we?

arivero said:
Now, you are probably right. Alexa shows that PF is a good match to sciam, in fact better than the other new partners.
Oh God, Alexa. Do you even know how they calculate their data? People have to install the Alexa toolbar on their PCs and that toolbar sends out usage information. And the people who usually install this toolbar are webmasters, it has little to no value for anyone else. So all Alexa can tell you is how popular a given website is among webmasters.

_Mayday_ said:
I bought my first American Scientist a few weeks back
You bought a scientist from the USA? How did you get him through customs?
 
Last edited:
  • #54
Hello,

How do I claim the 20% discount?

Thank you!
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 97 ·
4
Replies
97
Views
49K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
4K
  • · Replies 183 ·
7
Replies
183
Views
79K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K