Seagate SSD fails at end of large transfer

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hornbein
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hardware Storage
AI Thread Summary
A Seagate SSD failed during a large data transfer, but most important files were recoverable from other sources. It was noted that filling SSDs to capacity can lead to quicker failure, although the user did not approach full capacity and rarely used the drive. Concerns were raised about the longevity of external SSDs if not powered regularly, as well as potential overheating issues. The discussion highlighted that SSD failures often stem from internal controller circuitry rather than the NAND itself, which is generally more reliable. For backup purposes, traditional hard drives may be preferable due to their cost-effectiveness and reliability in maintaining multiple copies of data, despite being slower than SSDs. Seagate SSDs are noted for having issues with small component failures, which can lead to complete drive failure.
Hornbein
Gold Member
Messages
3,393
Reaction score
2,752
The standalone Seagate SSD that I got for backup failed completely toward the end of a massive transfer. Fortunately almost everything I valued was still available elsewhere. I bought a Seagate hard drive to replace it.
 
  • Wow
Likes Wrichik Basu and FactChecker
Computer science news on Phys.org
jedishrfu said:
Did you try to fill it to capacity?
Never got close to capacity. Rarely used it.
 
Hornbein said:
Rarely used it.

My understanding is that external SSDs don't do well if you don't power them up regularly. Could that be your issue?
 
phinds said:
My understanding is that external SSDs don't do well if you don't power them up regularly. Could that be your issue?
Could be.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes hutchphd and phinds
Hornbein said:
toward the end of a massive transfer.
Heat, maybe? Insufficient cooling?
 
Rive said:
Heat, maybe? Insufficient cooling?
Maybe 90 F.
 
There is a lot of lore around SSDs, some of it true, some of it once true, and likely some of it never true, However, if the entire drive is bricked, rather than returning errors, odds are that the failure was in the internal controller circuitry.

That said, SSD would not be my choice for backup. SSDs trade cost for speed, and for backup, having two copies, even if slower, usually performs the function better than one.
 
The NAND in SSDs seldom fails. It may be just a small capacitor that shorted or a fuse that blew, and is now preventing the entire board from working. Seagate SSDs are known for small component failures. That doesn't mean you should repair and re-use such drives, but from a data recovery perspective, the NAND seems to fail much less often compared to an SMD capacitor or fuse.
 

Similar threads

Back
Top