Why does entropy grow when a solar system is formed?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of entropy in the context of solar system formation, specifically addressing why a protostellar cloud is considered to have lower entropy compared to the solar system that forms from it. Participants explore the implications of gravitational forces, energy distribution, and the analogy of milk in coffee.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the assertion that a protostellar cloud has lower entropy than the resulting solar system, using the analogy of milk in coffee to illustrate their confusion.
  • Another participant argues that the gravitational forces involved in the collapse of the gas cloud complicate the entropy discussion, noting that while clumping reduces entropy, the heating and radiation of the gas as it collapses increases entropy overall.
  • This participant emphasizes the importance of considering energy distribution when evaluating the system's order, suggesting that the energy from the cloud becomes spread out as radiation, which contributes to an overall increase in entropy.
  • A later reply acknowledges the clarity provided by the explanation regarding energy, indicating that the initial confusion has been addressed.
  • A participant corrects the attribution of a referenced source, clarifying the name of the author of the linked write-up on entropy.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between entropy and the formation of a solar system, with no consensus reached on the initial question regarding the entropy of the protostellar cloud versus the solar system.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the complexity of entropy in gravitational systems and the role of energy dynamics, but does not resolve the underlying assumptions about entropy definitions or the specifics of the energy transformations involved.

Rovolvo
Messages
2
Reaction score
4
TL;DR
In "From eternity to here", Sean Carroll writes that the protostellar cloud had a lower entropy than te solar system it produced. That strikes me as odd. A solar system looks more arranged than a dust cloud. What am I missing here?
On page 50 of "From eternity to here", Sean Carroll writes that the protostellar cloud had a lower entropy than the solar system it produced. That strikes me as odd. A solar system looks more arranged than a dust cloud. When talking about entropy, someone always mentions the milk in the coffee. Milk in a drop of milk has lower entropy then milk spread in one of the billion ways it can spread between the "coffee molecules". Wouldn't you aggree, that the milk in a drop looks more like a planet and the milk all spread out looks more like the dustcloud. What am I missing here?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Science news on Phys.org
A collapsing cloud of gas is not quite like milk in coffee. The crucial part is that there is an attractive force in the form of gravity.
On the one hand, it causes the cloud to shrink and clump up - which gives us a pause, as this reduces the entropy. But on the other hand, the gas heats up as it shrinks. And then radiates into space. And then shrinks some more. And then radiates. And so on. The key is not to forget about the radiation part.
If we want to think about this in terms of how ordered a system is, it's best to consider where the energy was when you had a cloud, and where it is when it's become a bunch of rocks. You should be able to see that a lot of the energy that was initially confined to the area of space where the cloud was, has been 'smeared' around a huge volume of space (as radiation). This wins over the decrease of entropy from matter clumping into dense balls.

John Baez has a nice write-up on the topic here: https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/entropy.html , with more detailed treatment. He's a bit coy in not wanting to provide the final answer on a plate, though.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman, sophiecentaur, russ_watters and 4 others
Bandersnatch said:
A collapsing cloud of gas is not quite like milk in coffee. The crucial part is that there is an attractive force in the form of gravity.
On the one hand, it causes the cloud to shrink and clump up - which gives us a pause, as this reduces the entropy. But on the other hand, the gas heats up as it shrinks. And then radiates into space. And then shrinks some more. And then radiates. And so on. The key is not to forget about the radiation part.
If we want to think about this in terms of how ordered a system is, it's best to consider where the energy was when you had a cloud, and where it is when it's become a bunch of rocks. You should be able to see that a lot of the energy that was initially confined to the area of space where the cloud was, has been 'smeared' around a huge volume of space (as radiation). This wins over the decrease of entropy from matter clumping into dense balls.

John Baez has a nice write-up on the topic here: https://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/entropy.html , with more detailed treatment. He's a bit coy in not wanting to provide the final answer on a plate, though.
Thanks, that makes so much sense. The energy part, that was what I was missing.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman, russ_watters and Bystander
Oh, poo. I've just noticed. The link attribution should read John Baez. Not his arguably more musical cousin Joan.

[Typo fixed in your post above by a Mentor] :smile:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Bystander

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
8K