Searching for a Solid Proof of Chasles/Mozzi/Cauchy's Theorem

  • Thread starter Thread starter ObsessiveMathsFreak
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Solid Theorem
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Chasles' Theorem, which asserts that any rigid body displacement can be represented as a screw motion. The theorem is also referred to as Mozzi's or Cauchy's screw theorem. A highly recommended resource is the paper by Dunham Jackson, which provides a comprehensive explanation of rigid body motions and their decomposition into rotations, translations, and screw motions. The paper is noted for its clarity, although it lacks diagrams.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rigid body mechanics
  • Familiarity with screw theory
  • Basic knowledge of linear algebra
  • Experience with geometric proofs
NEXT STEPS
  • Read Dunham Jackson's paper on rigid body motions
  • Explore detailed proofs of Chasles' Theorem
  • Study the applications of screw theory in engineering
  • Investigate the relationship between Mozzi's theorem and Cauchy's theorem
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, engineers, and physics students interested in rigid body dynamics and the mathematical foundations of motion. This discussion is particularly beneficial for those seeking rigorous proofs and applications of screw theory.

ObsessiveMathsFreak
Messages
404
Reaction score
8
I've unsuccessfully been looking for a decent proof of Chasles' Theorem which states that any rigid body displacement whatsoever can be decomposed into a screw motion. In other words, no matter what the displacement is, you can consider it the result of the partiles having moved to their positions by following a circular helixical path about a common axis, with a common angular speed.

I suppose I'm mostly looking for a (linear) algebraic type proof. Most proofs I've encountered have been fairly loose and unconvincing. Does anyone know of a solid proof of this theorem?

Awkwardly, this theorem is also variously known as Mozzi's or Cauchy's screw theorem.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In answer to my own question:

Shortly after making this post I stumbled across one of the best papers I've ever read.
http://www.jstor.org/view/00029890/di991259/99p1550p/0 by Dunham Jackson. It's old, but great, and completely and totally explains rigid body motions and their decompositions into rotations and translations and finally into screw motions. He refers to the theorem as Mozzi's theorem.

It's a great paper. I'd seriously recommend anyone to give it an hour of their time. It's an easy read, and the proofs are just brilliant. The only thing I could fault it on is a lack of diagrams.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for the link, this is a problem I've been annoyed with for a while too. I've worked out a semi-proof for the 2d case using similar triangles, but I would like to see the 3d case as well. Do you have a link for a free copy of the paper?
 
EFuzzy said:
Thanks for the link, this is a problem I've been annoyed with for a while too. I've worked out a semi-proof for the 2d case using similar triangles, but I would like to see the 3d case as well. Do you have a link for a free copy of the paper?
Attached is a copy of the paper.
 

Attachments

Thanks!
 
In sci-fi when an author is talking about space travellers or describing the movement of galaxies they will say something like “movement in space only means anything in relation to another object”. Examples of this would be, a space ship moving away from earth at 100 km/s, or 2 galaxies moving towards each other at one light year per century. I think it would make it easier to describe movement in space if we had three axis that we all agree on and we used 0 km/s relative to the speed of...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K