Second order Linear ODE - NEED HELP to finish

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves solving a second-order linear ordinary differential equation (ODE) of the form 22e^{2t}=y''+8y'-9y. The original poster references a related homogeneous equation and discusses the general solution for that case.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the choice of particular solution, questioning whether to use a basic form or a modified form due to the nature of the homogeneous solution. There are attempts to substitute a guessed solution into the ODE and verify its correctness.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on how to approach finding the particular solution and have pointed out the need to check calculations related to initial conditions. There is an ongoing exploration of the constants in the general solution, with some participants expressing uncertainty about their results.

Contextual Notes

The problem includes initial conditions y(0)=1 and y'(0)=3, which are influencing the discussion about the constants in the general solution. There is mention of discrepancies between manual calculations and results obtained from Mathematica.

pat666
Messages
703
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



[tex] 22e^{2t}=y''+8y'-9y [/tex]

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


The directly previous question to this was the same but homogeneous, i.e. the 22e^(2t) was replaced with a 0.
So I know the general solution to the homogeneous ode is [tex]C_1e^t+C_2e^{-9t}[/tex]
I know that r(x)=[tex]ke^{\gamma*x}[/tex] so the choice for [tex]y_p=Ce^{2t}[/tex] this next part is what I don't understand. I think I just use the Basic rule but an example very similar to mine uses the modification rule??

Please help

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
pat666 said:

Homework Statement



[tex] 22e^{2t}=y''+8y'-9y [/tex]

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


The directly previous question to this was the same but homogeneous, i.e. the 22e^(2t) was replaced with a 0.
So I know the general solution to the homogeneous ode is [tex]C_1e^t+C_2e^{-9t}[/tex]
I know that r(x)=[tex]ke^{\gamma*x}[/tex] so the choice for [tex]y_p=Ce^{2t}[/tex] this next part is what I don't understand. I think I just use the Basic rule but an example very similar to mine uses the modification rule??

Please help

Thanks

Since derivatives of e2t always have an e2t in their answer, it seems logical that if you want to get a constant times e2t out on the right (usually, in your case, on the left) you should try a constant times e2t for y to make the equation work. The only time this wouldn't work is if e2t is a solution to the homogeneous equation because then you would get 0. That is when you modify your guess to te2t.
 
Hey,
By constant do you mean 3e^2t or Ce^2t?

thanks
 
pat666 said:
Hey,
By constant do you mean 3e^2t or Ce^2t?

thanks

You try
Ce2t and figure out what C makes the equation work.
 
Yep that's what I thought you meant, I tried that before posting and it didn;t work for me at all.
[tex]y_p=Ce^{2t} y_p'=2Ce^{2t} y_p''=4Ce^{2t}[/tex]
Then I put them back into the original ODE
so: [tex]4Ce^{2t}+8(2Ce^{2t})-9(Ce^{2t})[/tex] also the question gives two initial conditions [tex]y(0)=1 y'(0)=3[/tex] could you tell me what I've done wrong??

Thanks
 
pat666 said:
Yep that's what I thought you meant, I tried that before posting and it didn;t work for me at all.
[tex]y_p=Ce^{2t} y_p'=2Ce^{2t} y_p''=4Ce^{2t}[/tex]
Then I put them back into the original ODE
so: [tex]4Ce^{2t}+8(2Ce^{2t})-9(Ce^{2t})[/tex] also the question gives two initial conditions [tex]y(0)=1 y'(0)=3[/tex] could you tell me what I've done wrong??

Thanks

You put them back both sides of the equation. The other side of the equation is 22e2t. Once you have figured out what C works you know yp = Ce2t with that value of C. Then your general solution is y = the general solution to your homogeneous equation + yp. Only then do you go to work on the initial conditons.
 
Equating both sides such that I have 11Ce^(2t)=22e^(2t) its pretty obvious that C = 2.
so now I have [tex]y_p=2e^(2t)[/tex] so [tex]y=C_1e^t+c_2e^-9t+2e^(2t)[/tex] then I solve for C1 and C2 and get C1=-0.8 and C2=-0.2, I know this is wrong because Mathematica solved it as y[t]=e^t(-1+2e^(2t)) what have I stuffed up?

Thanks
 
Yes, [itex]y(t)= C_1e^t+ C_2e^{-9t}+ 2e^{2t}[/itex] is the general solution.
But I suggest you recalculate the constants. You may have an arithmetic mistake.

[itex]y'(t)= C_1 e^t- 9C_2e^{-9t}+ 4e^2t[/itex] so we must have
[itex]y(0)= C_1+ C_2+ 2= 1[/itex] and [itex]y'(0)= C_1- 9C_2+ 4= 3[/itex].
 
I have recalculated several times, I can't figure it out. I know I'm wrong because I have done it in mathematica. Ill write out what I did here so you might be able to tell where I've gone wrong.
[tex]y(0)=1[/tex]
[tex]1=C_1+C_2+2[/tex]
[tex]y'[t]=C_1e^t-9C_2e^{2t}+4e^{2t}[/tex]
[tex]3=C_1-9C_2+4[/tex]
[tex]-1+9C_2=C_1[/tex]
[tex]1=-1+9C_2+c_2+2[/tex]
Now I keep getting C_2=0 which is wrong!Thanks
 
  • #10
Whoops, yes C_2 should = 0 and C_1=-1.

Problem solved I think
[tex]y[t]=-e^t+2e^{2t}[/tex]
Mathematicas answer is [tex]e^t(-1+2e^t)[/tex] which is exactly the same thing I think?
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K