Second Order ODE - Variation of Parameters

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving the second-order ordinary differential equation (ODE) given by y''(t) + 4y'(t) + 4y(t) = t^(-2)e^(-2t) for t > 0 using the method of variation of parameters. The general solution is derived as y = c1e^(-2t) + c2te^(-2t) after correcting the initial error where the Wronskian was incorrectly calculated as zero. The participant identifies that the correct form of the second solution involves using the product rule, which resolves the issue with the Wronskian.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of second-order ordinary differential equations
  • Familiarity with the method of variation of parameters
  • Knowledge of Wronskian determinants in differential equations
  • Proficiency in applying the product rule in calculus
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of variation of parameters in detail
  • Learn how to compute the Wronskian for different functions
  • Review the product rule and its applications in differential equations
  • Explore additional examples of second-order ODEs with non-homogeneous terms
USEFUL FOR

Students studying differential equations, mathematicians focusing on ODE solutions, and educators teaching advanced calculus concepts.

tracedinair
Messages
47
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Find the general solution of the following diff. eqn.

y''(t) + 4y'(t) + 4y(t) = t^(-2)*e^(-2t) where t>0

Homework Equations



General soln - Φgeneral(t) + Φparticular(t)

Wronskian - Φ1(t)Φ22'(t) - Φ2(t)Φ1'(t)

The Attempt at a Solution



I'm solving by variation of parameters.

First solving for the general solution, y'' + 4y' + 4y = 0

r2 + 4r + 4 which factors into (r+2)(r+2), so r = -2, -2.

So the gen solution is y = c11e^(-2t) + c2e^(-2t)

Now solving for the particular solution.

Φ1 and Φ2= e^(-2t)

The Wronskian here ends up being 2e^(-4t) - 2e^(-4t) which equals zero.

What went wrong here? I know the Wronskian cannot equal zero here. This is where I am stuck.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Wow, two seconds after I posted this I realize what I did wrong. Φ2 is equal to te^(-2t). Not e^(-2t). But that still equals zero haha.

Edit again: I didn't use product rule. That was the problem.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K