Second order Sigma Delta modulator

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the stability of second-order Sigma Delta modulators, specifically the transition from first-order to second-order designs as described in "Data Converters" by F. Maloberti. The use of two integrators in the feedback loop can lead to instability due to the roots of the system's characteristic polynomial being located on the imaginary axis, which causes oscillation. The participants clarify that while the first-order modulator appears stable, the analysis of stability should consider the non-linear nature of the system, suggesting a need for further exploration of stability in Sigma Delta architectures.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Sigma Delta modulation principles
  • Familiarity with Laplace transforms
  • Knowledge of feedback system stability criteria
  • Basic concepts of non-linear systems analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the stability analysis of non-linear systems
  • Study the characteristics of second-order Sigma Delta modulators
  • Explore advanced topics in feedback control systems
  • Read "Data Converters" by F. Maloberti for in-depth understanding
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, signal processing specialists, and students studying ADC design and stability analysis in Sigma Delta modulation systems.

solanojedi
Messages
33
Reaction score
0
Hi everybody,
I'm reading about sigma delta adc, the base theory. I've read about the first order modulator and now the second order, but I have a problem (maybe stupid) with a phrase of my book (Data Converters by F.Maloberti), when he describe the 'passage' from first order to second order. He says: "Better performances and features are secured by using two integrators around the loop thus forming a second-order modulator as shown in the conceptual scheme of Fig. 6.11 (a). Since the use of two integrators in a feedback loop can
cause instability, it is necessary to dump one of the two integrators by using one of the two options represented by the dotted lines of Fig. 6.11 (a)." (Fig. 6.11 (a) is attached) Why two integrators in the loop can cause instability? I can't see why... Thank you very much!
 

Attachments

  • Immahssgine.jpg
    Immahssgine.jpg
    18.7 KB · Views: 539
Engineering news on Phys.org
Let's say we took out the dotted lines. Let's also say that we are going to ignore any effect that the ADC/DAQ will have. In that case, we have a simple feedback system with the following relationships in the Laplace domain:

y(s) is the Laplace transform of the output.

x(s) is the Laplace transform of the input.

\frac{1}{s^2} is the Laplace transform of double integration.

The equation of the feeback is system it this:

y(s) = \frac{1}{s^2} \left( x(s) - y(s) \right)

Rearranging we will get:

y(s) = \frac{\frac{1}{s^2}}{1 + \frac{1}{s^2}} x(s)

y(s) = \frac{1}{s^2 + 1} x(s)

The polynomial of the denominator decides the stability (s^2 + 1). To be stable, the roots in the Laplace domain must have a negative real component. This system has roots 0-i,0+i. They are on the imaginary axis which means that just about any input will cause this system to oscillate.
 
Thanks for your answer!

The problem is that, if we analyze the system with the Laplace (or Z-transform), we can see that also in the first order modulator we have a 1/1+s in the transfer function, so also the first order must be instable. I think the instability should be analyzed without linear methods, because it is a non linear system. So, there is a book or a paper where I can find a discussion about the stability of this architecture of second order sigma modulator? [i.e, a first order modulator with two integrators in series instead of one]
Thank you!
 
the root of \frac{1}{1 + s} is -1

It's stable.
 
Ooops, you're right..! :)
Thank you!
 
No problem, good luck with your studies.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K