Second Quantization: Creation & Annihilation Operators

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of second quantization, specifically focusing on the roles of creation and annihilation operators in relation to matrix elements and their analogy to kets and bras in first quantization. Participants explore the implications of these operators within the framework of Fock space and occupation number states.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the kinetic energy operator in second quantization and draws an analogy between creation/annihilation operators and kets/brads in first quantization.
  • Another participant explains that the creation operator adds a particle to a system and relates this to the outer product representation in the single particle Hilbert space.
  • A participant seeks clarification on the inclusion of multiple-particle states in the expansion of the creation operator.
  • Further clarification is provided regarding the necessity of including terms that involve states with more than one particle in the expansion of the creation operator.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

The discussion contains some agreement on the analogy between creation/annihilation operators and kets/brads, but there is uncertainty regarding the inclusion and representation of multiple-particle states in the context of these operators.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the mathematical treatment of multiple-particle states and their relationship to the operators being discussed, indicating a need for further clarification on the definitions and implications of these terms.

Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0
Hi all

I am reading about second quantization. The kinetic energy operator T we write as

<br /> \hat T = \sum\limits_{i,j} {\left\langle i \right|T\left| j \right\rangle } \,c_i^\dag c_j^{}.<br />

Now, the creation and annihilation operators really seem to be analogous (in some sense) to the ket and the bra in first quantization, since they tell us which matrix element we are talking about.

What is the reason for this? I understand that we have the new states in Fock space (the occupation number states), but my book never illuminates why the creation and annihilation operators designate the matrix elements just like the outer product in first quantization does.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Niles,

The creation operator c_i^+ adds one particle to the system in the single particle state labeled by i. If |i\rangle denotes the state where the system has one particle in single particle state i, then you know that |i\rangle = c_i^+ |\text{vac} \rangle. This means you can write c^+_i = |i \rangle \langle \text{vac} | + \text{...} where ... consists of states with more than one particle. Thus in the single particle Hilbert space the creation operators and annihilation operators are literally the outer products you are more familiar with. For example, c_i^+ c_j = |i \rangle \langle \text{vac} | \text{vac} \rangle \langle j | + \text{...} = | i \rangle \langle j | + \text{...}.

Does this help at all?
 
Hi Physics_Monkey

Yes, that is a very good explanation. Although I do not quite get what you mean by: "where ... consists of states with more than one particle.". We have |i \rangle \langle \text{vac} |, which is an operator. To this operator we add multiple-particle states (i.e. vectors) - is that allowed?
 
Last edited:
What I mean is that because because c_i^+ adds one particle to any state, the expansion of c_i^+ in terms of outer products can't stop with | i \rangle \langle \text{vac} |. There must be other terms like |\text{2 particles} \rangle \langle \text{1 particle} |. However, each of these terms contains at least one bra or ket with more than one particle. This is what I mean by ... containing states with more than one particle.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
853
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
12K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K