Seeing the Past: Can Light Traveling in Space be Observed?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter AnthreX
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Light Observed Space
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on the concept of observing light traveling through space and the implications of light's speed and energy loss. Participants highlight that while light does not lose energy in a vacuum, it can spread out over distance, making it difficult to observe. The conversation also touches on the idea of seeing the past through telescopes, as observing distant celestial bodies allows us to see them as they were in the past due to the time it takes for light to reach Earth. The analogy of seeing one's reflection in a mirror is used to illustrate the concept of perceiving the past.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the speed of light (approximately one foot per nanosecond)
  • Basic principles of optics and telescopes
  • Knowledge of light propagation in a vacuum versus a medium
  • Familiarity with the concept of time dilation in astrophysics
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the physics of light propagation in different mediums
  • Explore the capabilities of modern telescopes for astronomical observation
  • Learn about the implications of light travel time in astronomy
  • Investigate the concept of time perception and relativity in physics
USEFUL FOR

Astronomers, physics enthusiasts, educators, and anyone interested in the nature of light and time in the universe.

AnthreX
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
say that..
you shoot a really strong light facing towards space from earth,
as the light travels in space it would lose energy and start to disappear. but before it all disappears, what if you use a really strong telescope pointing at the direction that you shot your light into space? would you be able to see that light traveling ? even though its damn fast.

this is just my opinion , i think you can see the past and hear the past in deep deep deep space
 
Science news on Phys.org
When you look at any of the heavenly bodies you are looking into the past, just as you said. Count the seconds between seeing a lightning bolt and hearing the thunder(5 seconds per mile). I never heard a star. Why?
 
And when you look at the mirror and you see your own figure, you are seeing the past, how you were aprox. 60 nano-seconds before.
 
Originally posted by Clausius2
And when you look at the mirror and you see your own figure, you are seeing the past, how you were aprox. 60 nano-seconds before.

Well, not that long. LIght travels at very close to one foot per nanosecond, so if you were, say, two feet from your mirror, the light being reflected would go four feet to get back to you, and you would see yourself as you were 4 nanoseconds ago.
 
you can't hear suns cos sound are pressure waves and there's no medium in space.

as for looking back in time with a telescope, you don't need to first fire a strong beam of light.

a little bit of humor: i once told my mum of the possibility of placing a mirror 1000 lightyears away from earth, and looking at it, with the mirror aimed at earth. and how we'd see Earth and what was happening on it 2000 years ago. and she says

"wouldnt the people on Earth notice the mirror and telescope watching them?"
 
Originally posted by selfAdjoint
Well, not that long. LIght travels at very close to one foot per nanosecond, so if you were, say, two feet from your mirror, the light being reflected would go four feet to get back to you, and you would see yourself as you were 4 nanoseconds ago.

Hilarious! So, if I could blink really fast(faster than is possible), I could look at myself in the mirror seeing a reflection of myself that has it's eyes closed!
 
Light does not lose energy when traveling through space.

A perfect laser beam will stay intact forever until it hits something. A real (imperfect) laser will spread out, however, the further it goes. It will not disappear, but its energy will become spread over a larger area.

You *could* use a telescope to see your laser pulse, if some substance in the intervening space was scattering some of the light back to Earth. If the intervening space was truly a vacuum, however, you could not see it.

- Warren
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
728
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
6K