Self-adjusting orbiting solar shield

  • Thread starter Thread starter OwlHoot
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Shield Solar
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the concept of a self-adjusting orbiting solar shield designed to mitigate global warming by reflecting sunlight away from Earth. The proposed design involves large, ultra-thin mirrors positioned at the L1 Lagrange point, utilizing rotation and possibly multiple moving parts to counteract photon pressure. Participants discuss the feasibility of maintaining stable orbits through active control mechanisms, including adjusting the mirror's orientation and surface area to balance gravitational and radiation forces. The conversation also references Isaac Asimov's insights on waste heat from human activities as a significant concern in climate discussions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrange points, specifically L1
  • Familiarity with photon pressure and its effects on large structures in space
  • Basic knowledge of orbital mechanics and stability
  • Awareness of climate change issues and the role of greenhouse gases
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mechanics of Lagrange point stability and control systems
  • Explore the design principles of solar sails and reflective materials
  • Investigate the implications of waste heat on climate change and potential mitigation strategies
  • Study existing projects or proposals for space-based solar reflectors
USEFUL FOR

Climate scientists, aerospace engineers, environmental policy makers, and anyone interested in innovative solutions to global warming challenges.

OwlHoot
Messages
9
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
Solar shield whose rotation cancels out net effects of photon pressure over the course of an orbit
It is widely accepted that global warming caused by accumulating greenhouse gases is happening and, as the late Isaac Asimov pointed out years ago, even if or when this is curbed, if the population remains at similar levels as now then just the waste heat from human activities will eventually be an equally serious and even more intractable problem.

One obvious way to reduce heat is to launch and install in near-Earth space large reflective mirrors to divert some sunlight away from the Earth. These could be either positioned at the L1 Lagrange point or closer in orbit round the Earth. But in either case, assuming the mirrors were large, for example a hundred mile wide disk of ultra-thin silver or the like, there's a problem: photon pressure, which will propel them away from where they need to be!

So (getting to the point) I wondered if it would be possible to design for an "unpowered" orbiting mirror a combination of rotation, possibly involving multiple moving parts, over the course of an orbit such that the photon pressure exerted toward the Earth when the mirror was between the two, or in what might be called the "near half" of its orbit, could be compensated by pressure exerted away from the Earth over the rest of the orbit such that it maintained stable, albeit perturbed, orbits over time.

Perhaps some design involving rotating slats like a steel blind, with offset "guide mirrors" at either end to turn the slats would work, analogous to the guide vane at the top of a windmill to keep it turned into the wind.

This might make a good undergrad physics project, if it hasn't already been done. The design would have to be pretty simple and, if possible, should not rely on powered propulsion (although perhaps a few solar-powered electric motors would be allowed, if that helps or turns out to be indispensable).

Regards

John R Ramsden

https://highranges.com
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you place the screen slightly closer to the Sun than L1, could the greater solar gravity not counter the radiation pressure?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker and mfb
Good point, but wouldn't the mirror then be orbiting the Sun slightly faster than the Earth and thus soon drift sideways ahead of it, in the absence of an additional retarding force? But perhaps some arrangement of slightly angled mirrors very close to the L1 point could counteract both the net gravity toward the Sun and the tendency to pull ahead of the Earth.
 
Last edited:
Looking at the Sun-Earth potential gradient near L1, it feels intuitively correct that it should be possible to maintain a stable position somewhat nearer the Sun, where the towards-Sun gradient is canceled by the force from the reflected light, but it will require some kind of active control.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker
L1 is a saddle, that falls away towards the Sun on one side and to the Earth on the other, with a higher ridge on each side. It is to be expected that there will be a point, on the sunny side of the ridge, where the changed radial distance balances the radiation pressure. The circumferential slope would need to correct the orbital period, with the screen lagging L1. I wonder if the ½° shadow cone from that point would include the Earth.

Any orbit near L1 will have an unstable equilibrium, so will require some control to maintain position. Variation of the area, or surface orientation of a mirror, could use radiation pressure to maintain the position. With a diagonal mirror, the screen might be better positioned to cast a permanent shadow on the Earth.
 
It's not a stable orbit, but with active control over the mirror orientation, shape, reflectivity, ... you can keep it close to L1, a bit offset towards the Sun to counter the radiation pressure. There is no "tendency to pull ahead of the Earth".

You can probably find a suitable Earth orbit, but it comes with significant downsides: The shield is in front of Earth only for a fraction of the orbit, and when it's elsewhere it has the opposite effect - reflecting some sunlight and emitting infrared radiation, heating Earth.
 
"as the late Isaac Asimov pointed out years ago, even if or when this is curbed, if the population remains at similar levels as now then just the waste heat from human activities will eventually be an equally serious and even more intractable problem."

I'd like to see some data to back that statement up.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur
bob012345 said:
"as the late Isaac Asimov pointed out years ago, even if or when this is curbed, if the population remains at similar levels as now then just the waste heat from human activities will eventually be an equally serious and even more intractable problem."

I'd like to see some data to back that statement up.
Then go to the horse's mouth rather than characterizations of what Asimov said. There are two Asimov essays on the subject.

http://triumf.info/wiki/pwalden/images/1/18/Asimov_power_of_progression.pdf
http://triumf.info/wiki/pwalden/images/6/6d/The_end.pdf

I found that Asimov is addressing population more than climate. I also see that Asimov's 1971 predictions about 2070's climate are very close to current IPCC estimates.
 
anorlunda said:
Then go to the horse's mouth rather than characterizations of what Asimov said. There are two Asimov essays on the subject.

http://triumf.info/wiki/pwalden/images/1/18/Asimov_power_of_progression.pdf
http://triumf.info/wiki/pwalden/images/6/6d/The_end.pdf

I found that Asimov is addressing population more than climate. I also see that Asimov's 1971 predictions about 2070's climate are very close to current IPCC estimates.
I was quoting the OP. That's where the Asimov characterization was. Also, specifically the statement concerning waste heat from human activities.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
bob012345 said:
Also, specifically the statement concerning waste heat from human activities.
The explanation is in those two essays. Did you read them?
 
  • #11
anorlunda said:
The explanation is in those two essays. Did you read them?
Asimov seems to be saying if the population grows to unimaginably large numbers waste heat would be a problem (among even worse problems). The quote above says if the population stays at current levels and greenhouse gasses are curbed human waste heat will ultimately be a problem.
 
  • #12
bob012345 said:
Asimov seems to be saying ... The quote above says
Right. That's why it's always good to check the original source.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: bob012345
  • #13
anorlunda said:
Right. That's why it's always good to check the original source.
Thanks for putting them up! Azimov is always an entertaining read. I keep one of his books in the car if I'm stuck somewhere.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 271 ·
10
Replies
271
Views
28K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K