Self inductance of a very thin conductor, is infinity?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The self-inductance of a very thin conductor approaches infinity due to the mathematical behavior of the inductance formula, L = (μ₀ℓ / 2π) ln(b/a), where 'a' is the radius of the conductor and 'b' is the distance to the return path. When 'b' approaches infinity or 'a' approaches zero, the inductance diverges. This phenomenon differs from thick conductors because the return path for current is essential; without it, the inductance becomes undefined. The interior of the conductor contributes a finite inductance, L₀ = (μ₀ℓ / 4π), regardless of thickness, while thinner wires increase inductance due to greater flux linkage outside the wire.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic theory, particularly inductance.
  • Familiarity with Ampere's law and its applications.
  • Knowledge of the mathematical properties of logarithmic functions.
  • Basic concepts of coaxial cables and their configurations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the inductance formula for different conductor geometries.
  • Explore the implications of current density and flux density in conductors.
  • Learn about coaxial cable design and its impact on inductance.
  • Investigate the effects of conductor thickness on inductance and magnetic fields.
USEFUL FOR

Electrical engineers, physicists, and students studying electromagnetism, particularly those interested in inductance and its practical applications in circuit design.

constfang
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi, I was reading some text and came across this problem, the problem is also mentioned in this link from Wiki: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inductance#Self-inductance
They said that it is because the 1/R now becomes infinite, this is what I'm confused about. From my understand, there would be some point where R=0 while taking the integration, but in the thick conductor case, isn't there also overlapping point that make R=0? how come these points doesn't make the integration infinite? what made a thick wire so different from a very thin wire? and what's the physical meaning of this phenomena? Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the problem's even worse than you think it is! The inductance, L, of a length \ell of straight wire is given by
L = \frac{\mu_{0}\ell}{2\pi} ln\frac{b}{a}
in which a is the radius of the conductor and b is... Well, that's the problem: if you put it to infinity, your inductance goes off to infinity (just as badly as if you put a to zero. In fact the 'b' problem is easily understood: by putting b to infinity you're denying the possibility of a return path for the current. Surround the conductor by a return path in the form of a cylindrical shell (making a co-axial cable) and the problem is solved. There's no resultant field outside the cylinder, so you have to integrate only between the inner conductor and the cylinder.

As for your original problem, the field doesn't drop to zero as you penetrate the inner conductor, but is proportional to r, that is the distance to the central axis. You can easily derive this from Ampere's law. I think you'll find that the interior of the conductor contributes a finite amount, L0 to the inductance, namely
L0 = \frac{\mu_{0}\ell}{4\pi}.
 
Last edited:
I should have pointed out that (as you can see from my formula for L0) the thickness of the wire makes no difference to L0. Physically, for a given current, if the wire is thinner, the current density is greater, and also the flux density inside the wire, and there is the same amount of flux linked with it – even within the thinner wire.

But making the wire thinner will increase the inductance due to the flux linkage outside the wire, the bit that depends on ln\frac{b}{a}.
 
Last edited:
Thank you very much, that cleared out the cloud a little bit for me.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
14K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K