Self-Studying: Feedback Strategies for Students

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on strategies for self-studying upper-division physics, specifically using "Introduction to Electrodynamics" by David J. Griffiths. The challenge highlighted is the lack of provided answers for problems, which complicates self-assessment. Participants suggest alternatives for obtaining feedback, such as forming study groups or posting solutions for peer review. The importance of developing problem-solving skills without direct answers is emphasized, particularly for advanced studies.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with "Fundamentals of Physics" by Halliday, Resnick, and Walker
  • Understanding of MIT OpenCourseWare (OCW) resources for first-year physics
  • Basic knowledge of problem-solving techniques in physics
  • Experience with peer feedback mechanisms in academic settings
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore online forums for peer review of physics problems
  • Research study group formation strategies for self-learners
  • Investigate additional resources for "Introduction to Electrodynamics" solutions
  • Learn effective self-assessment techniques for advanced physics problems
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for self-studying physics students, particularly those transitioning to upper-division coursework, educators seeking feedback strategies, and anyone interested in enhancing their problem-solving skills in physics.

bacon
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
I'm sure there are many like myself who are self studiers: read the book, do the problems.
Right now I'm working through Halliday, Resnick and Walker, Fundamentals of Physics, and doing all the odd problems because the answers are in the back of the book. I'm also watching the MIT OCW lectures in first year physics and doing their homework which has the answer key published on their website. My problem is with the next phase, upper division work. I bought the book, Introduction to Electrodynamics, by Griffiths, because it seems to have the best reputation. Unfortunately, the answers are not provided for any of the problems. I made the mistake a few days ago of posting a request for answers to the problems and earned myself a warning. I was wrong to do so even though it was done in the spirit described above.
My question is how do I get feedback on the problems that I work? I won't know if they are wrong (unless I can't do them at all).
I could post all the problems I do and have others check my work. Is this permitted? This would be very labor intensive and might not comply with the spirit of homework help, since I might not actually need help if I were to do the problems correctly. Also, over time it would constitute a de facto solutions manual and therefore clearly against the rules.
Could a moderator address this issue?, and/or how has any other self studier approached this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For one thing, being able to say if your solution to a problem makes sense or not is a very valuable skill to have. In even more "upper-division" work (Think research), answers are not provided, you're supposed to find them. Similarly, if you're able to develop that skill, then more power to you.

But I do see your point, as you could work through the whole chapter but still miss the mark and get all of the problems wrong. Perhaps if you're enrolled at a university you could start a study group. Or you can, obviously, post your solution on here and plenty of people will comment on it.

You could also try looking around the web, but I doubt you'd find much for that type of book.

Good luck,

-D
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 102 ·
4
Replies
102
Views
9K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
3K