Sellmeier's equation & Least-squares Fitting

  • Thread starter Thread starter yo56
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fitting
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on determining Sellmeier's coefficients (S and λ0) using the least-squares fitting method applied to Sellmeier's dispersion equation, defined as n² = 1 + Sλ²/(λ² - λ₀²). The user expresses confusion regarding the application of the least-squares method to this equation compared to simpler linear equations like y = mx + b. Key issues include the placement of summation symbols and whether to use the squared or square root form of the equation. The discussion suggests a transformation of variables to simplify the fitting process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Sellmeier's dispersion equation
  • Proficiency in least-squares fitting techniques
  • Familiarity with linear regression concepts
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical transformations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the application of least-squares fitting to nonlinear equations
  • Learn about variable transformations in mathematical modeling
  • Explore advanced regression techniques for fitting complex models
  • Study the derivation and application of Sellmeier's coefficients in optics
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in optics, physicists working with dispersion equations, and anyone involved in data fitting and analysis using least-squares methods.

yo56
Messages
6
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Determine the values of Sellmeier's coefficients (S and λ0) using the least-squares method and Sellmeier's dispersion equation:
n2=1+Sλ2/(λ202)

Homework Equations


n2=1+Sλ2/(λ202)

The Attempt at a Solution


I understand how to use the least-squares method with a simple equation like y=mx+b (see below), but when trying to do the same thing with Sellmeier's equation, I get confused with where to put the summation symbols. Also, I am not sure if I use the squared version of Sellmeier's equation or to take the square root of it.

With y=mx+b, I know to take a y' point on the line corresponding to one of the points. A general equation would be achieved, i.e. Di=yi-y'i --> Di=yi-mxi+b. You would then square the equation, take the summation of it, and then the derivatives with respect to m and b to minimize, setting both equations equal to 0:

(1) Ʃ(yixi)-mƩ(xi2)-bƩ(xi)=0
(2) Ʃ(yi)-mƩ(xi)-bn=0, n is the number of data points

The solved linear equations yielded:
m=[Ʃ(xi)][Ʃ(yi)]-nƩ(yixi)/[[Ʃ(xi)]2-nƩ(xi2)]
b=[Ʃ(yixi)][Ʃ(xi)]-[Ʃ(xi2)][Ʃ(yi)]/[[Ʃ(xi)]2-nƩ(xi2)]

With Sellmeier's however, I am achieving some complex starting equations. Is there some mathematical "trick" I don't know about? Thanks for any help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could try to massage your equation somehow so that ##1/\lambda^2=x## and ##y=1/(n^2-1)##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K