Undergrad Semi ln plot- uncertainty estimation

Click For Summary
Calculating uncertainty from a semi-logarithmic plot can lead to significant discrepancies if not handled correctly. The discussion highlights the confusion surrounding the standard error derived from linear fitting and its impact on the calculated value of J'. The uncertainty in J' should account for variations in the fitted value, leading to a more accurate representation of uncertainty. A more refined approach may reveal asymmetric uncertainties, but initial estimates can be approximated by analyzing deviations. Ultimately, understanding the mathematical implications of uncertainty in exponential functions is crucial for accurate results.
Imperatore
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Hello there!

There is a problem with calculating the uncertainty from semi- ln plot. The linear fitting gives standard errors as you can see in attached picture. In the Y axis are ln J values, obviously. If the intersection with y-axis, x=0, then we get the point y=b=-33,21, and it's ln J', so the J' equals: exp(-33,21), ok it works fine. But the uncertainty of J' gives then value of exp(0,212), which is about 10^14 factor greater than the calculated value of J'.

What's wrong with my solution?
 

Attachments

  • semi ln plot.jpg
    semi ln plot.jpg
    49.9 KB · Views: 588
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Imperatore said:
But the uncertainty of J' gives then value of exp(0,212)
That is not what it gives. The uncertainty of 0.212 means your value 33.21 could also be 0.212 larger or smaller (there is a more mathematical statement behind it, but let's keep it at that level). What is exp(33.21 ± 0.212)?
 
  • Like
Likes Imperatore
I got it. Uncertainty is |exp(-33.21-0.212)-exp(-33.21+0.212)| equals 1,6 e-15 Is it really that simple?
 
It is not that simple, and a better treatment would likely lead to asymmetric uncertainties. But looking at the up and down deviation gives some reasonable approximation.
 
  • Like
Likes Imperatore
Oh, I should devided that relation |exp(-33.21-0.212)-exp(-33.21+0.212)| by 2, obviously.
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
680
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
855
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K