Semiconductor Energy Gap: Silicon Explained

alphard
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

I have a quick question about the energy of the silicon. I know that, as a semiconductor, the silicon has an energy gap between the valence band and the conduction band. But according to this image , http://www.google.fr/imgres?imgurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nano-ou.net%2FImages%2Fsilicon_split.png&imgrefurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.nano-ou.net%2FeduNanomaterials2.aspx&h=443&w=665&tbnid=lroOZttxuLz6EM%3A&zoom=1&docid=bVNjJ0Q6l2ncJM&ei=IW8MVYGONYPYOJ-ygeAO&tbm=isch&iact=rc&uact=3&dur=1859&page=1&start=0&ndsp=25&ved=0CCQQrQMwAQ , we see that when the interatomic distance between two atoms of silicon decreases, there is an interval where there is no more "forbidden energy gap" (where the two grey curves are connected). Does that mean that at this point, we have a conductor and not a semiconductor anymore ? I mean, by definition, a semiconductor has an energy gap, not as large as an insulator, but the gap exists. So, without any gap, it should by a conductor.

Thanks for your answers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well I am not sure, but there are semiconductors that when are exposed to mechanical strains, or other types of lattice distortions, their band structure changes, and sometimes they transit from semiconductors to conductors. So yes, you can have a material that is a semiconductor in normal conditions and become a conductor under certain conditions.
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...

Similar threads

Back
Top