Sen. Arlen Specter to switch parties

  • Context: News 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Switch
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around Senator Arlen Specter's announcement to switch from the Republican Party to the Democratic Party. Participants explore the implications of this change for party dynamics, electoral strategies, and Specter's voting behavior moving forward. The conversation touches on themes of party affiliation, political philosophy, and the current state of the Republican Party.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note that Specter's switch reflects a broader conservative schism within the Republican Party, suggesting that the party has alienated moderates.
  • Others argue that Specter's decision aligns with his political philosophy, which they believe is now more in line with Democratic ideals than Republican ones.
  • A few participants express hope that Specter might consider declaring himself an Independent, similar to other politicians, to support a third-party movement.
  • There are discussions about how Specter's change might affect his voting behavior, particularly regarding cloture votes and his independence from party pressures.
  • Some comments speculate on the potential impact of Specter's switch on upcoming elections, particularly regarding his re-election strategy and the position of other Republican senators.
  • Participants also reflect on the implications of Specter's past decisions, including his support for the stimulus package, and how they may have influenced his current standing within the Republican Party.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a range of views, with no clear consensus on the implications of Specter's party switch. Some agree that it highlights a shift in party dynamics, while others emphasize the need for independent voices in politics. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the potential outcomes of his decision.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the complexities of party affiliation and the influence of public opinion on political decisions. There are references to past events and decisions that may have shaped Specter's current political landscape, but these remain open to interpretation.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those following U.S. political dynamics, party affiliation issues, and the implications of individual political decisions on broader electoral strategies.

  • #91
Time presents an interesting view of the Republican Party now with the defection of Specter:
Republicans in the Wilderness: Is the Party Over?
By Michael Grunwald Thursday, May. 07, 2009
..."Chick-fil-A can get fabulously wealthy with a 20% market share," scoffs Mississippi Governor Haley Barbour, President Ronald Reagan's political director. "In our business, you need 50% plus one." It's probably true that since 200,000 Pennsylvania Republicans have switched parties, Specter followed them to save his own political skin, but it's hard to see how the mass exodus bodes well for the GOP. You can't have a center-right coalition when you've said good riddance to the center.
http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,1896588,00.html

Buried within is also news that Joe the Plumber is apparently quitting the Republican Party along with Arlen Specter.
... Samuel Wurzelbacher, better known as Joe the Plumber, tells TIME he's so outraged by GOP overspending, he's quitting the party ...
They can't even keep Joe the Plumber? Where will their ideas come from?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #92
So Specter lost his seniority yesterday, but today gets a Sub-Committee chairmanship - Judiciary Crime and Drugs Sub-Committee.
Dems give Specter Judiciary subcommittee chair
By LAURIE KELLMAN and KIMBERLY HEFLING – 36 minutes ago

WASHINGTON (AP) — Senate Democrats gave party switcher Arlen Specter a plum Judiciary subcommittee chairmanship on Thursday as a potential primary challenger to the veteran Pennsylvania lawmaker stepped forward.

Majority Whip Dick Durbin of Illinois said he would give up his chairmanship of the Crime and Drugs subcommittee in exchange for becoming chairman of a panel on human rights. The move, he said, would "best utilize Senator Specter's talents and experience in our caucus."

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., indicated later that the deal was not final and had to be worked out.
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gVxZU8Co2GhDJbwy1R6zN6sHO-CAD981GQSG0
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #93
LowlyPion said:
He's still listed.
http://judiciary.senate.gov/about/members.cfm

Given the shrinking nature of the Republican Party, he should just stay in place to keep it representative of their relative numbers in the Senate shouldn't he?

He's just been delisted by Reid.
 
  • #94
I suppose the website will have to catch up. It still shows Specter caucusing with the Republicans.

http://judiciary.senate.gov/about/members.cfm

Dick Durbin was rather magnanimous in ceding his sub-committee to Specter after he was stripped of seniority.

The way he's going Specter may not be running in 2010 anyway. His transition to Democratic ideals has been a little less than graceful.

When it catches up it will show Sessions as the ranking member for the Republicans. They are having to dig deep.
 
  • #95
In the race to oppose Specter, it looks like Specter is doing the right thing.

Tom Ridge has declared himself out of the race now.
http://firstread.msnbc.msn.com/archive/2009/05/07/1925437.aspx

So that means that if he gets by the Democratic Primary, that he will likely have an easy go of it against the more rigidly conservative and apparently unacceptable to the general electorate Twomey.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
9K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 82 ·
3
Replies
82
Views
20K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
6K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
7K
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K