Pension halt for Congress' crooks

  • News
  • Thread starter Ivan Seeking
  • Start date
In summary, a coalition of citizen groups are urging the new Democratic leaders in Congress to include in any ethics reform the denial of pensions to lawmakers convicted of felonies. The coalition believes that this will end the practice of rewarding lawmakers who abuse the law with plush pension packages funded by the American taxpayer. Some individuals have raised concerns about this proposal, arguing that it should only apply to actions committed while in office and that pensions are a part of the compensation package for serving in Congress. However, others argue that it is a fair consequence for those who have committed felonies. Some retired Congressmen are currently receiving large retirement benefits, which some view as excessive.
  • #1
Ivan Seeking
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
8,142
1,756
WASHINGTON — More than 20 citizen groups are urging the new Democratic leaders in Congress to include in any ethics reform the denial of pensions to lawmakers convicted of felonies.

"We must end the practice of rewarding lawmakers who abuse the law with plush pension packages funded by the American taxpayer," the coalition wrote in a letter to be sent today to Rep. Nancy Pelosi and Sen. Harry Reid, who will become speaker of the House and Senate majority leader when Democrats assume control of Congress in January. [continued][/quote]
http://www.azstarnet.com/news/158289

What a novel idea! :rolleyes: Yes, I can get behind that one.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Ivan Seeking said:
WASHINGTON — More than 20 citizen groups are urging the new Democratic leaders in Congress to include in any ethics reform the denial of pensions to lawmakers convicted of felonies.

"We must end the practice of rewarding lawmakers who abuse the law with plush pension packages funded by the American taxpayer," the coalition wrote in a letter to be sent today to Rep. Nancy Pelosi and Sen. Harry Reid, who will become speaker of the House and Senate majority leader when Democrats assume control of Congress in January. [continued]
http://www.azstarnet.com/news/158289

What a novel idea! :rolleyes: Yes, I can get behind that one.

I could agree with that if it were for actions committed while in office.

I don't have a serious problem with yanking retirement benefits for any lawmakers convicted of a felony, but their retirement really is part of the compensation package for the time they serve in Congress. In the interests of fairness, what they do after or before their time in Congress should be irrelevant.

I'd also categorize their pensions as "pretty damn good" rather than plush. The typical pension is around $41,000 to $55,000 a year - but only because most Congressmen don't serve that many years. I think a Congressman needs to serve 5 years before they're eligible to receive a retirement benefit and one serving a single six year Senate term would get $16,500 a year for the rest of their life. Not a bad add-on to whatever job they work the rest of their life considering they only served 6 years. The 'plush' retirements are generally drawn by those that have spent 20 years or more in Congress and have COLA kick in. Some of those that served 30 years in Congress, retired around 50, and still alive around 80 are receiving some pretty hefty retirement money.
http://money.cnn.com/2006/01/20/commentary/wastler/wastler/index.htm
http://www.c-span.org/questions/weekly68.asp
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
It is quite disheartening to see lawmakers, who are supposed to be setting an example for the rest of the country, engaging in unethical and criminal behavior. It sends the message that there are no consequences for their actions and that they are above the law. Denying pensions to lawmakers convicted of felonies is a step in the right direction towards holding them accountable for their actions and restoring faith in the government. I hope that this proposal is seriously considered and implemented in the near future.
 

1. What does "pension halt for Congress' crooks" mean?

The term "pension halt for Congress' crooks" refers to a proposal to stop or suspend pension payments for members of Congress who have been convicted of criminal activity or ethical violations.

2. Is this proposal currently in effect?

No, this proposal is not currently in effect. It is a proposed measure that has been debated and discussed by lawmakers, but it has not been passed into law.

3. How would this affect members of Congress?

If this proposal were to become law, it would mean that any member of Congress who has been convicted of a crime or ethical violation would no longer receive pension payments from the government.

4. What is the purpose of this proposal?

The purpose of this proposal is to hold members of Congress accountable for their actions and to prevent them from receiving financial benefits from their time in office if they have engaged in criminal or unethical behavior.

5. Are there any potential drawbacks to this proposal?

Some potential drawbacks to this proposal include concerns about due process and the potential for political bias in determining which members of Congress are considered "crooks" and have their pensions halted. There may also be legal challenges to this measure if it were to be implemented.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
6K
  • General Discussion
4
Replies
114
Views
12K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
8
Views
2K
Back
Top