Sensitive dependence on initial conditions

Click For Summary
Sensitive dependence on initial conditions is a key characteristic of chaotic systems, where even minor errors in initial conditions can lead to vastly different outcomes. The discussion highlights the challenge of predicting future behavior in chaotic systems due to the limitations of numerical integration, which can amplify errors. It raises the question of whether it is feasible to maintain small errors in predictions given the inherent sensitivity of these systems. The conversation also touches on the importance of understanding error terms in approximations, as they are crucial for accurate calculations in chaotic dynamics. Ultimately, the complexities of chaos theory necessitate advanced computational methods to address these challenges effectively.
broegger
Messages
257
Reaction score
0
Hi.

I'm starting a project on chaos very soon and I was just wondering...

One of the distinguishing features of a "chaotic system" is the sensitive dependence on initial conditions. It is stated that if we knew the initial conditions with infinite precision we would also be able to predict the future behavior of the system, i.e. no chaos. But how? There are no analytical solutions to these problems, so we'd have to rely on numerical integration, which is of course only approximate.

So, suppose we take a point in phase space, which is our infinitely precise initial condition, and start integrating numerically in small timesteps. Because of the sensitive dependence on initial conditions the errors in the numerical integration scheme will amplify greatly and our prediction will be useless... In fact, how can we say anything about these kind of systems without computers of infinite precision?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because of the sensitive dependence on initial conditions the errors in the numerical integration scheme will amplify greatly and our prediction will be useless...
Then all you have to do is make sure that the greatly amplified error is still small.
 
Yes, that seems plausible, but is it always possible? One could imagine that it would be practically impossible if the sensitivity is critical enough. It usually isn't, I guess, since no one seems to care about it. It just seems like a problem as significant as the problem of the precise measurement of initial conditions.

Thanks, by the way, for answering, I love this place ;-)
 
There's a reason people prove theorems about the error term in approximations. They're not just there to annoy Calc II students. :smile: Do you remember doing problems such as: "How many intervals do you need so that Simpson's rule has an error of less than 0.01?" in your classes?
 
No, obviously I don't :biggrin: I'll take a look at it, though. Thanks!
 
Another question along these lines is:

"How many terms of the Taylor series do you need so that the error is less than 0.07?"
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K