Sensitive dependence on initial conditions

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of sensitive dependence on initial conditions in chaotic systems, emphasizing that knowing initial conditions with infinite precision does not guarantee predictability due to the amplification of errors in numerical integration. The participants highlight the challenges of accurately predicting behavior in chaotic systems, particularly when using numerical methods that are inherently approximate. The conversation also touches on the significance of understanding error terms in approximations, such as those encountered in Simpson's rule and Taylor series expansions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of chaotic systems and their characteristics
  • Familiarity with numerical integration techniques
  • Knowledge of error analysis in numerical methods
  • Basic concepts of Taylor series and approximation theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore numerical integration methods, focusing on their error characteristics
  • Study the implications of chaotic behavior in dynamical systems
  • Learn about error bounds in numerical approximations, particularly in Simpson's rule
  • Investigate the role of Taylor series in approximating functions and their convergence properties
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in chaos theory, mathematicians, and anyone involved in numerical analysis or computational simulations of dynamic systems.

broegger
Messages
257
Reaction score
0
Hi.

I'm starting a project on chaos very soon and I was just wondering...

One of the distinguishing features of a "chaotic system" is the sensitive dependence on initial conditions. It is stated that if we knew the initial conditions with infinite precision we would also be able to predict the future behavior of the system, i.e. no chaos. But how? There are no analytical solutions to these problems, so we'd have to rely on numerical integration, which is of course only approximate.

So, suppose we take a point in phase space, which is our infinitely precise initial condition, and start integrating numerically in small timesteps. Because of the sensitive dependence on initial conditions the errors in the numerical integration scheme will amplify greatly and our prediction will be useless... In fact, how can we say anything about these kind of systems without computers of infinite precision?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Because of the sensitive dependence on initial conditions the errors in the numerical integration scheme will amplify greatly and our prediction will be useless...
Then all you have to do is make sure that the greatly amplified error is still small.
 
Yes, that seems plausible, but is it always possible? One could imagine that it would be practically impossible if the sensitivity is critical enough. It usually isn't, I guess, since no one seems to care about it. It just seems like a problem as significant as the problem of the precise measurement of initial conditions.

Thanks, by the way, for answering, I love this place ;-)
 
There's a reason people prove theorems about the error term in approximations. They're not just there to annoy Calc II students. :smile: Do you remember doing problems such as: "How many intervals do you need so that Simpson's rule has an error of less than 0.01?" in your classes?
 
No, obviously I don't :biggrin: I'll take a look at it, though. Thanks!
 
Another question along these lines is:

"How many terms of the Taylor series do you need so that the error is less than 0.07?"
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K