MHB Sentences about the Template algorithm

  • Thread starter Thread starter evinda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Algorithm
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the Template algorithm for constructing a minimum spanning tree from a connected graph. It highlights that the algorithm can be executed at most |V|-1 times, as each addition of a secure edge connects different components without forming cycles. The concept of a minimum spanning tree is clarified, noting that it is not unique when edges have equal weights. Additionally, the distinction between a forest and a connected tree is emphasized, with the algorithm maintaining a minimum spanning forest throughout its execution. The participants seek clarification on intersections in the graph and the properties of secure edges, demonstrating a collaborative effort to understand the algorithm's mechanics.
evinda
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,741
Reaction score
0
Hello! (Wave)

Could you explain me some sentences,that are related to the following algorithm?

Code:
Template algorithm(G)
   A<-∅
   while A isn't a connected tree
           we define an edge (u,v),that is secure for A
           A<-A U {(u,v)} 
   return A

  • Let $G=(V,E)$ be an undirected connected graph with weight function $w:E \to \mathbb{R}$.Let $A \subseteq E$,that is contained in a minimum spanning tree for the graph $G$ and let $(S, V \setminus S)$ any intersection of $G$,that respects $A$.Let,also, $(u,v)$ a light edge,crossing the intersection $(S, V \setminus S)$.Then,the edge $(u,v)$ is secure for $A$.
    $$$$
  • A minimum spanning tree isn't unique.
    $$$$
  • The Template Algorithm is implemented at most $|V|-1$ times.
    $$$$
    Does this sentence maybe stand,because of the fact that $G$ is connected,so $|E|=|V|-1$,and if during the implementation,cycles aren't created,the "while" loop is implemented so many times as the number of edges,so $|V|-1$ times? (Thinking)
    $$$$
  • Let $G_A=(V,A)$.Then, $G_A$ is a forest and each of its connected components , is a tree.

    Why is $G_A$ a forest and not a connected tree,although the condition of the algorithm is:

    Code:
    while A isn't a connected tree

    ? (Thinking)
    $$$$
  • Any secure edge $(u,v)$ for $A$ connects different components of $A$.
 
Last edited:
Technology news on Phys.org
Heya! (Blush)

evinda said:
  • Let $G=(V,E)$ be an undirected connected graph with weight function $w:E \to \mathbb{R}$.Let $A \subseteq E$,that is contained in a minimum spanning tree for the graph $G$ and let $(S, V \setminus S)$ any intersection of $G$,that respects $A$.Let,also, $(u,v)$ a light edge,crossing the intersection $(S, V \setminus S)$.Then,the edge $(u,v)$ is secure for $A$.

What is that: $(S, V \setminus S)$ any intersection of $G$,that respects $A$? :confused:
  • A minimum spanning tree isn't unique.

If you have edges with equal weight, you may be able to choose which one to include in the mimimum spanning tree.
  • The Template Algorithm is implemented at most $|V|-1$ times.
    $$$$
    Does this sentence maybe stand,because of the fact that $G$ is connected,so $|E|=|V|-1$,and if during the implementation,cycles aren't created,the "while" loop is implemented so many times as the number of edges,so $|V|-1$ times? (Thinking)
    $$$$

Not quite. $G$ can have more edges than that.

How many edges can any tree have at most? (Wondering)
That identifies how many times you can add a secure edge.
  • Let $G_A=(V,A)$.Then, $G_A$ is a forest and each of its connected components , is a tree.

    Why is $G_A$ a forest and not a connected tree,although the condition of the algorithm is:

    Code:
    while A isn't a connected tree

    ? (Thinking)
    $$$$

Let's take a look at the following algorithm:
200px-MST_kruskal_en.gif


At which stages is it a forest of trees? (Wondering)

  • Any secure edge $(u,v)$ for $A$ connects different components of $A$.

At any time $A$ represents a minimum spanning forest of trees.
If you remove any edge from $A$, it will split one of its trees into 2 sub trees. (Mmm)
 
I like Serena said:
What is that: $(S, V \setminus S)$ any intersection of $G$,that respects $A$? :confused:

The edge $(u,v) \in E$ crosses the intersection $(S, V \setminus S)$, if one of its vertices is in $S$ and the other one in $V \setminus S$.

View attachment 3169

An intersection $(S, V \setminus S)$ respects a set of edges, if no edge of the set crosses the intersection.

I like Serena said:
If you have edges with equal weight, you may be able to choose which one to include in the mimimum spanning tree.

I understand.. (Yes)
I like Serena said:
Not quite. $G$ can have more edges than that.

How many edges can any tree have at most? (Wondering)
That identifies how many times you can add a secure edge.

$|V|-1$, in order that we don't have cycles.. Or am I wrong? (Thinking)

I like Serena said:
Let's take a look at the following algorithm:At which stages is it a forest of trees? (Wondering)

Nice algorithm! (Mmm) Isn't it a forest of trees at each stage? (Thinking)

I like Serena said:
At any time $A$ represents a minimum spanning forest of trees.
If you remove any edge from $A$, it will split one of its trees into 2 sub trees. (Mmm)

I understand! (Nod)
 

Attachments

  • intersection.png
    intersection.png
    2.7 KB · Views: 88
evinda said:
$|V|-1$, in order that we don't have cycles.. Or am I wrong? (Thinking)

Nice algorithm! (Mmm) Isn't it a forest of trees at each stage? (Thinking)

I understand! (Nod)

Yep, yep, and good! (Happy)
 
Thread 'Is this public key encryption?'
I've tried to intuit public key encryption but never quite managed. But this seems to wrap it up in a bow. This seems to be a very elegant way of transmitting a message publicly that only the sender and receiver can decipher. Is this how PKE works? No, it cant be. In the above case, the requester knows the target's "secret" key - because they have his ID, and therefore knows his birthdate.
Dear Peeps I have posted a few questions about programing on this sectio of the PF forum. I want to ask you veterans how you folks learn program in assembly and about computer architecture for the x86 family. In addition to finish learning C, I am also reading the book From bits to Gates to C and Beyond. In the book, it uses the mini LC3 assembly language. I also have books on assembly programming and computer architecture. The few famous ones i have are Computer Organization and...
I tried a web search "the loss of programming ", and found an article saying that all aspects of writing, developing, and testing software programs will one day all be handled through artificial intelligence. One must wonder then, who is responsible. WHO is responsible for any problems, bugs, deficiencies, or whatever malfunctions which the programs make their users endure? Things may work wrong however the "wrong" happens. AI needs to fix the problems for the users. Any way to...
Back
Top