Separating a hamiltonian into C.O.M and relative hamiltonians

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around separating a two-body Hamiltonian into center of mass and relative Hamiltonians in the context of Hamiltonian mechanics. The original poster presents the Hamiltonian and seeks to explore two methods for this separation, involving momentum operators in both abstract and position representation forms.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the definitions of center of mass and relative position vectors, and how to express the momenta in terms of these variables. There are attempts to clarify the relationships between the variables and the Hamiltonian, as well as questions about the process of rewriting the Hamiltonian.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on how to express the positions and momenta in terms of the center of mass and relative coordinates. However, there is a lack of consensus, as others express confusion about the process and seek further clarification.

Contextual Notes

There is an assumption that participants have a foundational understanding of Hamiltonian mechanics. The discussion includes a note that the problem does not explicitly state certain definitions, which may lead to confusion.

richyw
Messages
179
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that the two-body hamiltonianH_{\text{sys}}=\frac{\mathbf{p}_1^2}{2m_1}+\frac{\mathbf{p}_2^2}{2m_2}+V( \mathbf{r}_1,\mathbf{r}_2)can be separated into centre of mass and relative hamiltoniansH_{\text{sys}}=\frac{\mathbf{P}^2}{2M}+\frac{\mathbf{p}_{\text{rel}}}{2\mu}+V(r)Do this in two ways:

a)with momentum operators in abstract
b)momentum operators in the position representation

Homework Equations


I'm assuming this one, the text does not actually say
M=m_1+m_2mu=\frac{m_1m_2}{m_1+m_2}\mathbf{P}=\mathbf{p}_1+\mathbf{p}_2\mathbf{p}_{\text{rel}}=\frac{m_1\mathbf{p}_2-m_2\mathbf{p}_1}{m_1+m_2}

The Attempt at a Solution



I have tried to do this by plugging the definitions into the equations. tried working backwards too. not really sure where to start here!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can write r_2-r_1=r and R=\frac{m_1r_1+m_2r_2}{m1 + m2}.

Using these, you can solve for r_1 and r_2 in terms of R and r. Then, obviously, you can find momentum or the two objects in terms of R and r.

It is important to remember that R is the center of mass. If you end up with a term that says \frac{1}{2}(m_1+m_2)\dot{R}^2 then you can say "Not interested in translational energy of the entire system, thus, this term can be neglected.. Etc etc. Use your imagination :)

Lastly, don't forget that these r's are vectors. I'm not sure how much of a difference it will make in your math, but it's still an important point.
 
sorry. I am already lost. how can I obviously find the momentum in terms of r and R?
 
richyw said:
sorry. I am already lost. how can I obviously find the momentum in terms of r and R?

My apologies, I assumed that if you are studying Hamiltonian mechanics you would understand what I was saying.

Let me reiterate:
From my example above r is the vector that points from mass 1 to mass 2. Also R is the vector that points to the center of mass from the origin.

Using those two definitions, you can solve for r_1 in terms of R and r. Meaning that you can get r_1=... where the only thing on the right would be R's, r's, and masses. No r_1's or r_2's.

Total momentum is mass times velocity. Therefore, p_1=m_1v_1=m_1\dot{r}_1 where \dot{r}_1 is the derivative of r_1 with respect to time, AKA, the velocity of mass 1.

Anyways, the problem is asking you to rewrite the Hamiltonian in terms of R's and r's. Since you know what p_1 is and you know r_1 in terms of R's and r's, you can find momentum in terms of R's and r's. The same can be said for p_2. Thus, the problem is pretty much solved.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K