Separating a hamiltonian into C.O.M and relative hamiltonians

richyw
Messages
179
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that the two-body hamiltonian[tex]H_{\text{sys}}=\frac{\mathbf{p}_1^2}{2m_1}+\frac{\mathbf{p}_2^2}{2m_2}+V( \mathbf{r}_1,\mathbf{r}_2)[/tex]can be separated into centre of mass and relative hamiltonians[tex]H_{\text{sys}}=\frac{\mathbf{P}^2}{2M}+\frac{\mathbf{p}_{\text{rel}}}{2\mu}+V(r)[/tex]Do this in two ways:

a)with momentum operators in abstract
b)momentum operators in the position representation

Homework Equations


I'm assuming this one, the text does not actually say
[tex]M=m_1+m_2[/tex][tex]mu=\frac{m_1m_2}{m_1+m_2}[/tex][tex]\mathbf{P}=\mathbf{p}_1+\mathbf{p}_2[/tex][tex]\mathbf{p}_{\text{rel}}=\frac{m_1\mathbf{p}_2-m_2\mathbf{p}_1}{m_1+m_2}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



I have tried to do this by plugging the definitions into the equations. tried working backwards too. not really sure where to start here!
 
You can write [itex]r_2-r_1=r[/itex] and [itex]R=\frac{m_1r_1+m_2r_2}{m1 + m2}[/itex].

Using these, you can solve for [itex]r_1[/itex] and [itex]r_2[/itex] in terms of [itex]R[/itex] and [itex]r[/itex]. Then, obviously, you can find momentum or the two objects in terms of [itex]R[/itex] and [itex]r[/itex].

It is important to remember that [itex]R[/itex] is the center of mass. If you end up with a term that says [itex]\frac{1}{2}(m_1+m_2)\dot{R}^2[/itex] then you can say "Not interested in translational energy of the entire system, thus, this term can be neglected.. Etc etc. Use your imagination :)

Lastly, don't forget that these r's are vectors. I'm not sure how much of a difference it will make in your math, but it's still an important point.
 
sorry. I am already lost. how can I obviously find the momentum in terms of r and R?
 
richyw said:
sorry. I am already lost. how can I obviously find the momentum in terms of r and R?

My apologies, I assumed that if you are studying Hamiltonian mechanics you would understand what I was saying.

Let me reiterate:
From my example above [itex]r[/itex] is the vector that points from mass 1 to mass 2. Also [itex]R[/itex] is the vector that points to the center of mass from the origin.

Using those two definitions, you can solve for [itex]r_1[/itex] in terms of [itex]R[/itex] and [itex]r[/itex]. Meaning that you can get [itex]r_1=...[/itex] where the only thing on the right would be [itex]R[/itex]'s, [itex]r[/itex]'s, and masses. No [itex]r_1[/itex]'s or [itex]r_2[/itex]'s.

Total momentum is mass times velocity. Therefore, [itex]p_1=m_1v_1=m_1\dot{r}_1[/itex] where [itex]\dot{r}_1[/itex] is the derivative of [itex]r_1[/itex] with respect to time, AKA, the velocity of mass 1.

Anyways, the problem is asking you to rewrite the Hamiltonian in terms of [itex]R[/itex]'s and [itex]r[/itex]'s. Since you know what [itex]p_1[/itex] is and you know [itex]r_1[/itex] in terms of [itex]R[/itex]'s and [itex]r[/itex]'s, you can find momentum in terms of [itex]R[/itex]'s and [itex]r[/itex]'s. The same can be said for [itex]p_2[/itex]. Thus, the problem is pretty much solved.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K